Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23386999›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2013

Burkholderia vaccines: are we moving forward?

Leang-Chung Choh, Guang-Han Ong, Kumutha M Vellasamy, Kaveena Kalaiselvam, Wen-Tyng Kang, Anis R Al-Maleki, Vanitha Mariappan, Jamuna Vadivelu

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Nanomedicine: New Frontiers in Fighting Microbial Infections.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Immune Control ofFrontiers in immunology · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Leang-Chung ChohDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Guang-Han Ong
Kumutha M Vellasamy
Kaveena Kalaiselvam
Wen-Tyng Kang
Anis R Al-Maleki
Vanitha Mariappan
Jamuna Vadivelu
University Malaya Medical Centre · MYUniversity of Malaya · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genus Burkholderia consists of diverse species which includes both "friends" and "foes." Some of the "friendly" Burkholderia spp. are extensively used in the biotechnological and agricultural industry for bioremediation and biocontrol. However, several members of the genus including B. pseudomallei, B. mallei, and B. cepacia, are known to cause fatal disease in both humans and animals. B. pseudomallei and B. mallei are the causative agents of melioidosis and glanders, respectively, while B. cepacia infection is lethal to cystic fibrosis (CF) patients. Due to the high rate of infectivity and intrinsic resistance to many commonly used antibiotics, together with high mortality rate, B. mallei and B. pseudomallei are considered to be potential biological warfare agents. Treatments of the infections caused by these bacteria are often unsuccessful with frequent relapse of the infection. Thus, we are at a crucial stage of the need for Burkholderia vaccines. Although the search for a prophylactic therapy candidate continues, to date development of vaccines has not advanced beyond research to human clinical trials. In this article, we review the current research on development of safe vaccines with high efficacy against B. pseudomallei, B. mallei, and B. cepacia. It can be concluded that further research will enable elucidation of the potential benefits and risks of Burkholderia vaccines.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacterial VaccinesBurkholderia cepaciaBurkholderia InfectionsBurkholderia malleiBurkholderia pseudomalleiCost-Benefit AnalysisCystic FibrosisGlandersHumansMelioidosisModels, AnimalVaccines, AttenuatedVaccines, DNAVaccines, InactivatedBacterial VaccinesVaccines, AttenuatedVaccines, DNAVaccines, InactivatedBurkholderia cepaciaBurkholderia malleiBurkholderia pseudomalleicystic fibrosisglandersmelioidosisvaccine

Identifiers

PMID23386999
PMCPMC3564208
OpenAlexW2146665553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.