Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23386560›Full record

ArticleChemical senses2013

Interactions of odorants with olfactory receptors and other preprocessing mechanisms: how complex and difficult to predict?

Jean-Pierre Rospars

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical senses, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A physicochemical model of odor sampling.PLoS computational biology · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Responsiveness to Sugar Solutions in the MothFrontiers in physiology · 2019
    Article
  8. Take time: odor coding capacity across sensory neurons increases over time in Drosophila.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jean-Pierre RosparsUMR 1272 Physiologie de l'Insecte: Signalisation et Communication & Unité Mathématiques et Informatique Appliquées, INRA, F-78000 Versailles, France. jean-pierre.rospars@versailles.inra.fr

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this issue of Chemical Senses, Münch et al. present a thorough analysis of how mixtures of odorants interact with olfactory receptors (ORs) borne by olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs). Using fruit fly ORNs expressing the receptor OR22a, they provide a clear example of mixture interaction and confirm that the response of an ORN to a binary mixture can be sometimes predicted quantitatively knowing the ORN responses to its components as shown previously in rat ORNs. The prediction is based on a nonlinear model that assumes a classical 2-step activation of the OR and competition of the 2 odorants in the mixture for the same binding site. Can this success be generalized to all odorant-receptor pairs? This would be an encouraging perspective, especially for the fragrance and flavor industries, as it would permit the prediction of all mixtures. To address this question, I outline its conceptual framework and discuss the variety of mixture interactions found so far. In accordance with the effects described in the study of other receptors, several kinds of mixture interactions have been found that are not easily predictable. The relative importance of the predictable and less predictable effects thus appears as a major issue for future developments.

Indexed as

AnimalsDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsFemaleOlfactory Receptor NeuronsPerfumeReceptors, OdorantDrosophila ProteinsOR22a protein, DrosophilaPerfumeReceptors, Odorant

Identifiers

PMID23386560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.