ArticleThe British journal of radiology2013
Learning from incident reports in the Australian medical imaging setting: handover and communication errors.
Article in The British journal of radiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- From emergence to recoverability: a sociotechnical control trajectory theory of HIT-related risk.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- A qualitative, multi-framework methodology for analysing health information technology-related patient safety incidents.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Radiographers' Experiences of Clinical Handover in Diagnostic Imaging: A Qualitative Study of Communication, Safety, and Organizational Influences.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
- Development and assessment of the AE-RADS standardized grid for specifically evaluating adverse events in diagnostic radiology and teleradiology.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Development of minimum data set and dashboard for monitoring adverse events in radiology departments.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Provision of Safe Anesthesia in Magnetic Resonance Environments: Degree of Compliance with International Guidelines in Saudi Arabia.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- MRI and the Critical Care Patient: Clinical, Operational, and Financial Challenges.Critical care research and practice · 2023Review
- Detecting Patient Safety Errors by Characterizing Incidents Reported by Medical Imaging Staff.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- The variables perceived to be important during patient handover by South African prehospital care providers.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2019Article
- Gauging potential risk for patients in pediatric radiology by review of over 2,000 incident reports.Pediatric radiology · 2018Article
- Identification of quality improvement areas in pediatric MRI from analysis of patient safety reports.Pediatric radiology · 2018Article
- Current challenges and future perspectives for patient safety in surgery.Patient safety in surgery · 2014Article
- Engineering and clinical use of artificial intelligence (AI) with machine learning and data science advancements: radiology leading the way for future.Therapeutic advances in urologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo determine the type and nature of incidents occurring within medical imaging settings in Australia and identify strategies that could be engaged to reduce the risk of their re-occurrence.
methods71 search terms, related to clinical handover and communication, were applied to 3976 incidents in the Radiology Events Register. Detailed classification and thematic analysis of a subset of incidents that involved handover or communication (n=298) were undertaken to identify the most prevalent types of error and to make recommendations about patient safety initiatives in medical imaging.
resultsIncidents occurred most frequently during patient preparation (34%), when requesting imaging (27%) and when communicating a diagnosis (23%). Frequent problems within each of these stages of the imaging cycle included: inadequate handover of patients (41%) or unsafe or inappropriate transfer of the patient to or from medical imaging (35%); incorrect information on the request form (52%); and delayed communication of a diagnosis (36%) or communication of a wrong diagnosis (36%).
conclusionThe handover of patients and clinical information to and from medical imaging is fraught with error, often compromising patient safety and resulting in communication of delayed or wrong diagnoses, unnecessary radiation exposure and a waste of limited resources. Corrective strategies to address safety concerns related to new information technologies, patient transfer and inadequate test result notification policies are relevant to all healthcare settings. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Handover and communication errors are prevalent in medical imaging. System-wide changes that facilitate effective communication are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.