Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23385790›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2013

Coordinated genetic scaling of the human eye: shared determination of axial eye length and corneal curvature.

Jeremy A Guggenheim, Xin Zhou, David M Evans, Nicholas J Timpson, George McMahon, John P Kemp, Beate St Pourcain, Kate Northstone, Susan M Ring, Qiao Fan and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Optical and Visual Diet in Myopia.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. IMI - Myopia Genetics Report.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2019
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Journal of ophthalmology · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Jeremy A GuggenheimCentre for Myopia Research, School of Optometry, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong. jeremy.guggenheim@polyu.edu.hk
Xin Zhou
David M Evans
Nicholas J Timpson
George McMahon
John P Kemp
Beate St Pourcain
Kate Northstone
Susan M Ring
Qiao Fan
Tien-Yin Wong
Ching Yu Cheng
Chiea Chuen Khor
Tin Aung
Seang Mei Saw
Cathy Williams

Funding

Department of Health CDF-2009-02-35Medical Research Council 74882Medical Research Council G0600705Wellcome Trust 076467Wellcome Trust 092731Wellcome Trust WT083431MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo examine the extent to which the two major determinants of refractive error, corneal curvature and axial length, are scaled relative to one another by shared genetic variants, along with their relationship to the genetic scaling of height.

methodsCorneal curvature, axial length, and height were measured in unrelated 14- to 17-year-old white European participants of the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC; n = 1915) and in unrelated 40- to 80-year-old participants of the Singapore Chinese Eye Study (SCES; n = 1642). Univariate and bivariate heritability analyses were performed with methods that avoid confounding by common family environment, using information solely from genome-wide high-density genotypes.

resultsIN ALSPAC SUBJECTS, AXIAL LENGTH, CORNEAL CURVATURE, AND HEIGHT HAD SIMILAR LOWER-BOUND HERITABILITY ESTIMATES: axial length, h(2) = 0.46 (SE = 0.16, P = 0.002); corneal curvature, h(2) = 0.42 (SE = 0.16, P = 0.004); height, h(2) = 0.48 (SE = 0.17, P = 0.002). The corresponding estimates in the SCES were 0.79 (SE = 0.18, P < 0.001), 0.35 (SE = 0.20, P = 0.036), and 0.31 (SE = 0.20, P = 0.061), respectively. The genetic correlation between corneal curvature and axial length was 0.69 (SE = 0.17, P = 0.019) for ALSPAC participants and 0.64 (SE = 0.22, P = 0.003) for SCES participants. In the subset of 1478 emmetropic ALSPAC individuals, the genetic correlation was 0.85 (SE = 0.12, P = 0.008).

conclusionsThese results imply that coordinated scaling of ocular component dimensions is largely achieved by hundreds to thousands of common genetic variants, each with a small pleiotropic effect. Furthermore, genome-wide association studies (GWAS) for either axial length or corneal curvature are likely to identify variants controlling overall eye size when using discovery cohorts dominated by emmetropes, but trait-specific variants in discovery cohorts dominated by ametropes.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAsian PeopleAxial Length, EyeBody HeightCorneaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedRefractive ErrorsWhite People

Identifiers

PMID23385790
PMCPMC3626516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.