Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23385786›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Microbiology2013

Popping the cork: mechanisms of phage genome ejection.

Ian J Molineux, Debabrata Panja

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Microbiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 87 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
87citing papers in PubMed
14.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

87 citing papers in PubMed, 167 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A synthetic cell phage cycle.Nature communications · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Harnessing phages to tackle antimicrobial resistance: a Saudi Arabian perspective.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Viral Genome Delivery Across Bacterial Cell Surfaces.Annual review of microbiology · 2024
    Review
  14. Ejectosome ofPNAS nexus · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Ian J MolineuxMolecular Genetics and Microbiology, Institute for Cell and Molecular Biology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, USA. molineux@austin.utexas.edu.
Debabrata Panja
University of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

MECHANISMS OF PHAGE EXCLUSION SYSTEMR01GM032095 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN · PI MOLINEUX, IAN J · 1985 to 2008
$2.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM32095NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM032095
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sixty years after Hershey and Chase showed that nucleic acid is the major component of phage particles that is ejected into cells, we still do not fully understand how the process occurs. Advances in electron microscopy have revealed the structure of the condensed DNA confined in a phage capsid, and the mechanisms and energetics of packaging a phage genome are beginning to be better understood. Condensing DNA subjects it to high osmotic pressure, which has been suggested to provide the driving force for its ejection during infection. However, forces internal to a phage capsid cannot, alone, cause complete genome ejection into cells. Here, we describe the structure of the DNA inside mature phages and summarize the current models of genome ejection, both in vitro and in vivo.

Indexed as

Genome, ViralVirus UncoatingBacteriophagesDNA, ViralModels, BiologicalDNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID23385786
OpenAlexW2027603822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.