ArticleCurrent treatment options in cardiovascular medicine2013
Novel anticoagulant use for venous thromboembolism: a 2013 update.
Article in Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patients Undergoing Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty with Primary Hypercoagulable States.Orthopaedic surgery · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
opinion statementMany pharmacologic options are available for prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The anticoagulant selected may vary according the individual patient situation such as the acute versus chronic setting, renal function and indication for either VTE prevention or treatment. Established methods of pharmacologic prophylaxis agents include heparinoids, injectable anti-Xa inhibition and vitamin K antagonists (VKA). The novel anticoagulants have recently been incorporated into orthopedic surgery prophylaxis pathways and can be used for VTE treatment. Chronic VTE management, however, has largely been managed with the use VKA. The advantages of VKA include low cost, familiarity with use, and established protocols to manage catastrophic bleeding. VKA use, however, poses hurdles including the fact that correct dosing can be empiric, the existence of multiple potential medication and dietary interactions, and the possiblity for complications when anticoagulation levels are not well monitored. In contrast, the novel anticoagulants offer ease of dosing, reliable pharmacokinetics and low risk of interactions with other medications or diet. Potential hazards of the novel anticoagulants include high costs, questionable therapeutic benefit in those with poor adherence, a reliance on renal clearance, lack of reliable reversibility in the event of catastrophic bleeding, as well as incomplete familiarity with use by the general practitioner. Although clinical trials demonstrate promise of greater applicability of use of these novel agents, hospital systems will need to simultaneously create a plan for appropriate management of the use of these agents, an anticoagulation stewardship program. As guidelines are adopted to prevent and manage VTE, an appreciation for this new level of complexity is essential.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.