Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23385426›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2014

Genotoxicity in gingival cells of patients undergoing tooth restoration with two different dental composite materials.

Antonija Tadin, Nada Galic, Marin Mladinic, Danijela Marovic, Ivan Kovacic, Davor Zeljezic

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04460755 (Tooth Whitening Evaluation With Cytotoxic and Genotoxic Effect of Commercial Whitening Toothpastes on Oral Mucosal Cells), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04460755 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Tooth Whitening Evaluation With Cytotoxic and Genotoxic Effect of Commercial Whitening Toothpastes on Oral Mucosal Cells

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of ZagrebRan2019 to 2020Enrolled210ConditionsTeeth WhiteningArmsControl group, Whitening toothpaste 1, Whitening toothpaste 2, Whitening toothpaste 3, Whitening toothpaste 4
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Antonija TadinStudy of Dental Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Split, Soltanska 2, 21 000, Split, Croatia, atadin@mefst.hr.
Nada Galic
Marin Mladinic
Danijela Marovic
Ivan Kovacic
Davor Zeljezic
Institute for Medical Research and Occupational Health · HRUniversity of Split · HRUniversity of Zagreb · HR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesDental composite materials come into direct contact with oral tissue, especially gingival cells. This study was performed to evaluate possible DNA damage to gingival cells exposed to resin composite dental materials. MATERIALS AND

methodsClass V restorations were placed in 30 adult patients using two different composite resins. The epithelial cells of the gingival area along the composite restoration were sampled prior to and after 7, 30, and 180 days following the restoration of the tooth. DNA damage was analysed by comet and micronucleus assays in gingival exfoliated epithelial cells.

resultsThe results showed significantly higher comet assay parameters (tail length and % DNA in the tail) within periods of 30 and 180 days. The micronucleus test for the same exposure time demonstrated a higher number of cells with micronuclei, karyolysis, and nuclear buds. Results did not reveal any difference between the two composite materials for the same duration of exposure.

conclusionBased on the results, we can conclude that the use of composite resins causes cellular damage. As dental composite resins remain in intimate contact with oral tissue over a long period of time, further research on their possible genotoxicity is advisable. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Long-term exposure of gingival cells to two different composite materials demonstrated certain DNA damage. However, considering the significant decline in micronuclei frequency after 180 days and efficiency in the repair of primary DNA damage, the observed effects could not be indicated as biologically relevant.

Indexed as

Dental Restoration, PermanentDNA DamageAcrylic ResinsAdultComet AssayComposite ResinsEpithelial CellsFemaleGingivaHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMicronucleus TestsMiddle AgedPolyurethanesAcrylic ResinsComposite Dental ResinComposite ResinsPolyurethanes

Identifiers

PMID23385426
OpenAlexW2032345519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.