Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23385373›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in critical care2013

New trends in hyperosmolar therapy?

Michael N Diringer

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in critical care, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Serum osmolality and hyperosmolar states.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Management of Elevated Intracranial Pressure: a Review.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2019
    Review
  13. The Medical Management of Cerebral Edema: Past, Present, and Future Therapies.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2019
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Fluid Management in Acute Brain Injury.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2018
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Microdialysate concentration changes do not provide sufficient information to evaluate metabolic effects of lactate supplementation in brain-injured patients.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael N DiringerNeurocritical Care Section, Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO 63110, USA. diringerm@wustl.edu
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

PHYSIOLOGIC RESPONSE TO OSMOTIC THERAPY IN CEREBRAL EDEMA PATIENTSP50NS035966 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI DIRINGER, MICHAEL N · 2007 to 2007
$1.0M
NINDS NIH HHS 5P50NS05597704NINDS NIH HHS P50 NS035966
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewTo discuss trends in the use of osmotic therapy. RECENT

findingsUse of osmotic therapy has evolved from bolus administration of mannitol to routine use of hypertonic saline as a bolus as well as in continuous infusions to creating a sustained hyperosmolar state.In a survey of neurointensivists 55% favored hypertonic saline over mannitol. Retrospective studies suggest better intracranial pressure (ICP) control with hypertonic saline. Whereas a prospective study in adults with head injury compared alternating doses of mannitol and hypertonic saline and found no difference in change in ICP control or outcome, two meta-analyses, which did not include this study, favored hypertonic saline for ICP control (although the absolute difference of 2 mmHg is of little clinical value) with no difference in outcome.Hypertonic saline has also been administered by infusions to creating a sustained stable hyperosmolar state. Two studies, using historical controls, suggested benefit of hypertonic saline infusions. In a prospective, randomized study, in children with severe head injury Lactated Ringer's solution was compared to hypertonic saline. Although ICP control was similar, the hypertonic saline group required fewer other interventions. SUMMARY: The existing data do not support favoring boluses of hypertonic saline over mannitol in terms of ICP control, let alone outcome. The rationale for continuous infusions to create a sustained hyperosmolar state is open to discussion and use of this approach should be curtailed pending further research.

Indexed as

Brain IschemiaCerebral HemorrhageCraniocerebral TraumaCritical CareDiuretics, OsmoticFemaleHumansIntracranial HypertensionMaleMannitolOsmolar ConcentrationPractice Guidelines as TopicSaline Solution, HypertonicTreatment OutcomeDiuretics, OsmoticMannitolSaline Solution, Hypertonic

Identifiers

PMID23385373
PMCPMC3787692
OpenAlexW2022138381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.