Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23385110›Full record

Trial reportArchives of physical medicine and rehabilitation2013

Wheelchair skills training to improve confidence with using a manual wheelchair among older adults: a pilot study.

Brodie M Sakakibara, William C Miller, Melanie Souza, Viara Nikolova, Krista L Best

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Randomized controlled trial protocol feasibility: The Wheelchair Self-Efficacy Enhanced for Use (WheelSeeU).Canadian journal of occupational therapy. Revue canadienne d'ergotherapie · 2014
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Wheelchair Skills Test Outcomes across Multiple Wheelchair Skills Training Bootcamp Cohorts.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Exploratory Validation of a Multidimensional Power Wheelchair Outcomes Toolkit.Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2015
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Brodie M SakakibaraGraduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
William C Miller
Melanie Souza
Viara Nikolova
Krista L Best
University of British Columbia · CA

Funding

CIHR 76731-1CIHR MSH-76731
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the effects of wheelchair skills training on confidence in older adults who are inexperienced wheelchair users.

designParallel group, single-blind randomized controlled trial.

settingResearch laboratory in a rehabilitation hospital.

participantsParticipants (N=20) who were community-living older adults at least 65 years old (mean age, 70y), 50% women, and who had no experience of using a wheelchair were randomly allocated to an intervention (n=10) or control (n=10) group.

interventionsThe intervention group received two 1-hour training sessions that followed the Wheelchair Skills Training Program (WSTP) protocol. The control group received a single socialization contact.

main outcome measureThe Wheelchair Use Confidence Scale-Manual (WheelCon-M) was used to evaluate confidence with using a manual wheelchair. The WheelCon-M is a self-report questionnaire that comprises 65 items in 6 conceptual areas.

resultsA 1-way between-groups analysis of covariance revealed a significant difference in postintervention WheelCon-M scores between the intervention and control groups (F1,17=10.9, P=.004) after controlling for baseline WheelCon-M scores. A large effect size was also observed (partial η(2)=.39). Secondary analyses revealed that the WSTP had greater effects on confidence in areas related to maneuvering around the physical environment, knowledge and problem solving, advocacy, and managing emotions than in areas related to performing activities and behaving in social situations.

conclusionTwo 1-hour WSTP sessions improve confidence with using a manual wheelchair among older adults who are inexperienced wheelchair users.

Indexed as

Motor SkillsWheelchairsAgedAnalysis of VarianceFemaleHumansMalePersons with DisabilitiesPilot ProjectsSingle-Blind MethodSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID23385110
PMCPMC4019578
OpenAlexW2081599175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.