ArticleCritical care medicine2013
Participation of ICUs in critical care pandemic research: a province wide, cross-sectional survey.
Article in Critical care medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Views on consent approaches used in emergency and critical care research: a rapid, systematic review.Trials · 2026Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Modelling the potential increase in eligible participants in clinical trials with inclusion of community intensive care unit patients in Alberta, Canada: a decision tree analysis.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2024Trial
- Operational strategies among infectious disease clinical trial sites during pandemics: a scoping review.Trials · 2026Article
- Meta-trial of awake prone positioning with nasal high flow therapy: Invitation to join a pandemic collaborative research effort.Journal of critical care · 2020Article
- Principles Guiding Nonpandemic Critical Care Research During a Pandemic.Critical care medicine · 2020Review
- Addressing challenges for clinical research responses to emerging epidemics and pandemics: a scoping review.BMC medicine · 2020Article
- Clinician-researcher's perspectives on clinical research during the COVID19 pandemic.PloS one · 2020Article
- Always ready, always prepared-preparing for the next pandemic.Translational pediatrics · 2018Review
- Pandemic research in the ICU: always be prepared.Critical care medicine · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveLittle information exists to identify barriers to participation in pandemic research involving critically ill patients. We sought to characterize clinical research activity during the recent influenza A pandemic and to understand the experiences, beliefs, and practices of key stakeholders involved in pandemic research implementation.
designCross-sectional, provincial postal questionnaire.
settingLevel III ICUs.
participantsICU administrators and research coordinators. MEASUREMENTS: We used rigorous survey methodology to identify potential respondents and to develop, test, and administer two-related questionnaires. MAIN
resultsWe analyzed responses from 39 research coordinators and 139 administrators (response rates: 70.9% and 73.2%, respectively). Compared with non-influenza A studies, influenza A studies were less likely to be randomized trials and most often investigator-initiated and peer-review funded. Whereas both respondent groups felt that pandemic research would be helpful in providing care during future pandemics, research coordinators placed significantly greater importance on their ICU's participation in pandemic research. Both respondent groups expressed a need for rapid approval processes, designated funding for research personnel, adequate funding for start-up and patient screening, preapproved template protocols and consent forms, and clearer guidance regarding co-enrollment. Research coordinators acknowledged a need for alternative consent models to increase their capacity to participate in future pandemic research. More administrators expressed willingness to participate in the next pandemic if the required research resources were made available to them.
conclusionsWhereas research personnel and administrators support participation in pandemic ICU research, several modifiable barriers to participation exist. Pandemic research preparedness planning with regulatory bodies and dedicated funding to support research infrastructure, especially in community settings, are required to optimize future pandemic research participation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23385105What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.