Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23385105›Full record

ArticleCritical care medicine2013

Participation of ICUs in critical care pandemic research: a province wide, cross-sectional survey.

Karen E A Burns, Leena Rizvi, Wylie Tan, John C Marshall, Karen Pope

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Karen E A BurnsInterdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Keenan Research Centre and the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. burnskez@yahoo.ca
Leena Rizvi
Wylie Tan
John C Marshall
Karen Pope

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveLittle information exists to identify barriers to participation in pandemic research involving critically ill patients. We sought to characterize clinical research activity during the recent influenza A pandemic and to understand the experiences, beliefs, and practices of key stakeholders involved in pandemic research implementation.

designCross-sectional, provincial postal questionnaire.

settingLevel III ICUs.

participantsICU administrators and research coordinators. MEASUREMENTS: We used rigorous survey methodology to identify potential respondents and to develop, test, and administer two-related questionnaires. MAIN

resultsWe analyzed responses from 39 research coordinators and 139 administrators (response rates: 70.9% and 73.2%, respectively). Compared with non-influenza A studies, influenza A studies were less likely to be randomized trials and most often investigator-initiated and peer-review funded. Whereas both respondent groups felt that pandemic research would be helpful in providing care during future pandemics, research coordinators placed significantly greater importance on their ICU's participation in pandemic research. Both respondent groups expressed a need for rapid approval processes, designated funding for research personnel, adequate funding for start-up and patient screening, preapproved template protocols and consent forms, and clearer guidance regarding co-enrollment. Research coordinators acknowledged a need for alternative consent models to increase their capacity to participate in future pandemic research. More administrators expressed willingness to participate in the next pandemic if the required research resources were made available to them.

conclusionsWhereas research personnel and administrators support participation in pandemic ICU research, several modifiable barriers to participation exist. Pandemic research preparedness planning with regulatory bodies and dedicated funding to support research infrastructure, especially in community settings, are required to optimize future pandemic research participation.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCross-Sectional StudiesDisaster PlanningEmergency Service, HospitalHealth Services ResearchHumansInfluenza, HumanIntensive Care UnitsOntarioPandemicsRegional Health PlanningRegional Medical Programs

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.