Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23384373›Full record

ArticleJournal of studies on alcohol and drugs2013

Disparities in access to physicians and medications for the treatment of substance use disorders between publicly and privately funded treatment programs in the United States.

Amanda J Abraham, Hannah K Knudsen, Traci Rieckmann, Paul M Roman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Availability of Medications for the Treatment of Alcohol and Opioid Use Disorder in the USA.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amanda J AbrahamDepartment of Health Services Policy and Management, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina 29208, USA. aabraham@mailbox.sc.edu
Hannah K Knudsen
Traci Rieckmann
Paul M Roman

Funding

CTN Membership and Adoption of Innovative Tx PracticesR01DA014482 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA (UGA) · PI ROMAN, PAUL M · 2001 to 2011
$8.0M
ADOPTION OF INNOVATIONS IN PRIVATE A&D TREATMENT CENTERSR01DA013110 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA (UGA) · PI ROMAN, PAUL M · 1999 to 2010
$4.9M
Adoption of Innovations in Private A & D Treatment CentersR37DA013110 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI ROMAN, PAUL M · 2011 to 2015
$3.1M
Use of Evidence-based Practices in Alcoholism TreatmentR01AA015974 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA · PI ROMAN, PAUL M · 2008 to 2012
$3.0M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA015974NIAAA NIH HHS R01AA015974NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA013110NIDA NIH HHS R01DA013110NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA014482NIDA NIH HHS R01DA14482NIDA NIH HHS R37 DA013110
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePrior research suggests that publicly funded substance use disorder (SUD) treatment programs lag behind privately funded programs in adoption of evidence-based practices, resulting in disparities in access to high-quality SUD treatment. These disparities highlight a critical public health concern because the majority of SUD patients in the United States are treated in the publicly funded treatment sector. This study uses recent data to examine disparities in access to physicians and availability of medications for the treatment of SUDs between publicly and privately funded SUD treatment programs.

methodData were collected from 595 specialty SUD treatment programs from 2007 to 2010 via face-to-face interviews, mailed surveys, and telephone interviews with treatment program administrators.

resultsPublicly funded programs were less likely than privately funded programs to have a physician on staff, even after controlling for several organizational characteristics that were associated with access to physicians. The results of negative binomial regression indicated that, even after taking into account physician access and other organizational variables, publicly funded programs prescribed fewer SUD medications than privately funded SUD treatment programs.

conclusionsPatients seeking treatment in publicly funded treatment programs continue to face disparities in access to high-quality SUD treatment that supports patients' choices among a range of medication options. However, implementation of the Affordable Care Act may facilitate greater access to physicians and use of medications in publicly funded SUD treatment programs.

Indexed as

Evidence-Based PracticeFinancing, GovernmentHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Care SurveysHealth Services AccessibilityHumansPhysiciansPrivate SectorRegression AnalysisSubstance Abuse Treatment CentersSubstance-Related DisordersUnited States

Identifiers

PMID23384373
PMCPMC3568164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.