Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23384207›Full record

Trial reportBMC pediatrics2013

In-line filtration minimizes organ dysfunction: new aspects from a prospective, randomized, controlled trial.

Martin Boehne, Thomas Jack, Harald Köditz, Kathrin Seidemann, Florian Schmidt, Michaela Abura, Harald Bertram, Michael Sasse

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC pediatrics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00209768 (Randomised, Prospective Study of the Use of In-Line Filtration on the Reduction of Complication Rate in Critically Ill Children), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00209768 phase4completednot on this map

Randomised, Prospective Study of the Use of In-Line Filtration on the Reduction of Complication Rate in Critically Ill Children

TypeinterventionalSponsorHannover Medical SchoolRan2005 to 2008Enrolled821ConditionsCritical IllnessArmsFilter: NOE96E, ELD96E, NLF1E, TNA1E
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Martin BoehneDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Thomas Jack
Harald Köditz
Kathrin Seidemann
Florian Schmidt
Michaela Abura
Harald Bertram
Michael Sasse
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInfused particles induce thrombogenesis, impair microcirculation and modulate immune response. We have previously shown in critically ill children, that particle-retentive in-line filtration reduced the overall complication rate of severe events, length of stay and duration of mechanical ventilation. We now evaluated the influence of in-line filtration on different organ function and thereby elucidated the potential underlying pathophysiological effects of particle infusion.

methodsIn this single-centre, prospective, randomized controlled trial 807 critically ill children were assigned to either control (n = 406) or filter group (n = 401), the latter receiving in-line filtration for complete infusion therapy. Both groups were compared regarding the differences of incidence rates and its 95% confidence interval (CI) of different organ dysfunction as defined by the International Pediatric Sepsis Consensus Conference 2005.

resultsThe incidence rates of respiratory (-5.06%; 95% CI, -9.52 to -0.59%), renal (-3.87%; 95% CI, -7.58 to -0.15%) and hematologic (-3.89%; 95% CI, -7.26 to -0.51%) dysfunction were decreased in the filter group. No difference was demonstrated for the occurrence rates of cardiovascular, hepatic, or neurologic dysfunction between both groups.

conclusionsIn-line filtration has beneficial effects on the preservation of hematologic, renal and respiratory function in critically ill patients. The presented clinical data further support our hypothesis regarding potential harmful effects of particles. In critically ill patients infused particles may lead to further deterioration of the microcirculation, induce a systemic hypercoagulability and inflammation with consecutive negative effects on organ function.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov number; NCT00209768.

Indexed as

Drug ContaminationMicropore FiltersCatheterization, PeripheralCentral Venous CathetersChildChild, PreschoolCritical CareFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfusions, IntravenousIntention to Treat AnalysisMaleMultiple Organ FailureParticulate MatterParticulate Matter

Identifiers

PMID23384207
PMCPMC3571889
OpenAlexW2166267591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.