Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23383317›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

NMDA receptor subunits in the adult rat hippocampus undergo similar changes after 5 minutes in an open field and after LTP induction.

Maria Veronica Baez, Maria Victoria Oberholzer, Magali Cecilia Cercato, Marina Snitcofsky, Alejandra Ines Aguirre, Diana Alicia Jerusalinsky

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Sleep-dependent declarative memory consolidation--unaffected after blocking NMDA or AMPA receptors but enhanced by NMDA coagonist D-cycloserine.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2013
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. NMDAR Hypofunction Animal Models of Schizophrenia.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Re-Opening the Critical Window for Estrogen Therapy.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maria Veronica BaezInstituto de Biología Celular y Neurociencia-IBCN "Prof. Eduardo De Robertis" CONICET-UBA, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Maria Victoria Oberholzer
Magali Cecilia Cercato
Marina Snitcofsky
Alejandra Ines Aguirre
Diana Alicia Jerusalinsky
University of Buenos Aires · ARInstitute of Astronomy and Space Physics · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

NMDA receptor subunits change during development and their synaptic expression is modified rapidly after synaptic plasticity induction in hippocampal slices. However, there is scarce information on subunits expression after synaptic plasticity induction or memory acquisition, particularly in adults. GluN1, GluN2A and GluN2B NMDA receptor subunits were assessed by western blot in 1) adult rats that had explored an open field (OF) for 5 minutes, a time sufficient to induce habituation, 2) mature rat hippocampal neuron cultures depolarized by KCl and 3) hippocampal slices from adult rats where long term potentiation (LTP) was induced by theta-burst stimulation (TBS). GluN1 and GluN2A, though not GluN2B, were significantly higher 70 minutes--but not 30 minutes--after a 5 minutes session in an OF. GluN1 and GluN2A total immunofluorescence and puncta in neurites increased in cultures, as evaluated 70 minutes after KCl stimulation. Similar changes were found in hippocampal slices 70 minutes after LTP induction. To start to explore underlying mechanisms, hippocampal slices were treated either with cycloheximide (a translation inhibitor) or actinomycin D (a transcription inhibitor) during electrophysiological assays. It was corroborated that translation was necessary for LTP induction and expression. The rise in GluN1 depends on transcription and translation, while the increase in GluN2A appears to mainly depend on translation, though a contribution of some remaining transcriptional activity during actinomycin D treatment could not be rouled out. LTP effective induction was required for the subunits to increase. Although in the three models same subunits suffered modifications in the same direction, within an apparently similar temporal course, further investigation is required to reveal if they are related processes and to find out whether they are causally related with synaptic plasticity, learning and memory.

Indexed as

Analysis of VarianceAnimalsBlotting, WesternCells, CulturedCycloheximideDactinomycinElectric StimulationExploratory BehaviorHabituation, PsychophysiologicHippocampusLong-Term PotentiationMicroscopy, FluorescenceNeuronal PlasticityProtein SubunitsRatsReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateCycloheximideDactinomycinProtein SubunitsReceptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate

Identifiers

PMID23383317
PMCPMC3562335
OpenAlexW1980586443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.