Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23383218›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Optimization of multimeric human papillomavirus L2 vaccines.

Subhashini Jagu, Kihyuck Kwak, Balasubramanyam Karanam, Warner K Huh, Vijayarangam Damotharan, Sudha V Chivukula, Richard B S Roden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Protein engineering: status report.Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. HPV vaccines: Global perspectives.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2017
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Subhashini JaguDepartment of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Kihyuck Kwak
Balasubramanyam Karanam
Warner K Huh
Vijayarangam Damotharan
Sudha V Chivukula
Richard B S Roden

Funding

Treatment of HIV- and HIV+ Patients with HPV16+ CIN2/3 Using pNGLV4a-hCRTE6E7L2 DNA vaccine administered intramuscularly via electroporationP50CA098252 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Richard Bruce Roden · 2003 to 2026
$53.5M
Mechanisms of Papillomavirus NeutralizationR01CA118790 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI RODEN, RICHARD BRUCE · 2007 to 2018
$2.9M
A Phase I Study to Evaluate the Safety and Immunogenicity of HPV 16 L2 11-200R01CA133749 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI HUH, WARNER KING · 2008 to 2012
$1.4M
Development of low cost and broadly protective human papillomavirus vaccinesRC2CA148499 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI RODEN, RICHARD BRUCE · 2009 to 2010
$1000k
NCI NIH HHS CA118790NCI NIH HHS CA133749NCI NIH HHS P50 CA098252NCI NIH HHS R01 CA118790NCI NIH HHS R01 CA133749NCI NIH HHS RC2 CA148499
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We sought to define the protective epitopes within the amino terminus of human papillomavirus (HPV) type 16 minor capsid protein L2. Passive transfer of mice with rabbit antisera to HPV16 L2 peptides 17-36, 32-51 and 65-81 provided significant protection against vaginal HPV16 challenge, whereas antisera to 47-66, 108-120 or 373-392 did not. Vaccination with L1 virus-like particles induces a high titer, but generally type-restricted neutralizing antibody response. Conversely, vaccination with L2 11-88, especially multimers thereof, induces antibodies that neutralize a broad range of papillomavirus types, albeit at lower titers than for L1 VLP. With the intent of enhancing the immunogenicity and the breadth of protection by focusing the immune response to the key protective epitopes, we designed L2 fusion proteins consisting of residues ∼11-88 of eight divergent mucosal HPV types 6, 16, 18, 31, 39, 51, 56, 73 (11-88×8) or residues ∼13-47 of fifteen HPV types (13-47×15). The 11-88×8 was significantly more immunogenic than 13-47×15 in Balb/c mice regardless of the adjuvant used, suggesting the value of including the 65-81 protective epitope in the vaccine. Since the L2 47-66 peptide antiserum failed to elicit significant protection, we generated an 11-88×8 construct deleted for this region in each subunit (11-88×8Δ). Mice were vaccinated with 11-88×8 and 11-88×8Δ to determine if deletion of this non-protective epitope enhanced the neutralizing antibody response. However, 11-88×8Δ was significantly less immunogenic than 11-88×8, and even the addition of a known T helper epitope, PADRE, to the construct (11-88×8ΔPADRE) failed to recover the immunogenicity of 11-88×8 in C57BL/6 mice, suggesting that while L2 47-66 is not a critical protective or T helper epitope, it nevertheless contributes to the immunogenicity of the L2 11-88×8 multimer vaccine.

Indexed as

Adjuvants, ImmunologicAnimalsAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCapsid ProteinsEpitopesFemaleHuman papillomavirus 16HumansMiceNeutralization TestsOncogene Proteins, ViralPapillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesPeptidesRabbitsAdjuvants, ImmunologicAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCapsid ProteinsEpitopesL2 protein, Human papillomavirus type 16Oncogene Proteins, ViralPapillomavirus VaccinesPeptides

Identifiers

PMID23383218
PMCPMC3561222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.