Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23383157›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Phenytoin inhibits the persistent sodium current in neocortical neurons by modifying its inactivation properties.

Elisa Colombo, Silvana Franceschetti, Giuliano Avanzini, Massimo Mantegazza

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Late IMedicinal research reviews · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Competition between Persistent NaFrontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elisa ColomboDepartment of Neurophysiopathology, Epilepsy Center, Foundation IRCCS Neurological Institute C. Besta, Milan, Italy.
Silvana Franceschetti
Giuliano Avanzini
Massimo Mantegazza
Institut de Pharmacologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The persistent Na⁺ current (I(NaP)) is important for neuronal functions and can play a role in several pathologies, although it is small compared to the transient Na⁺ current (I(NaT)). Notably, I(NaP) is not a real persistent current because it undergoes inactivation with kinetics in the order of tens of seconds, but this property has often been overlooked. Na⁺ channel blockers, drugs used for treating epilepsy and other diseases, can inhibit I(NaP), but the mechanism of this action and the conditions in which I(NaP) can be actually inhibited have not been completely clarified yet. We evaluated the action of phenytoin (PHT), a prototype anti-epileptic Na⁺ channel blocker, on I(NaP) inactivation in pyramidal neurons of rat sensorimotor cortical slices at different concentrations, from 5 to 100 µM. PHT did not modify I(NaP) evoked with depolarizing voltage ramps of 50 or 100 mVs⁻¹, but decreased I(NaP) evoked by slower voltage ramps (10 mVs⁻¹). However, at all of the tested concentrations, PHT decreased I(NaP) evoked by faster ramps when they were preceded by inactivating pre-pulses. Moreover, PHT shifted towards negative potentials the voltage-dependence of I(NaP) inactivation and accelerated its kinetics of development also at depolarized potentials (+40 mV), not consistently with a simple inactivated state stabilizer. Therefore, our study shows a prominent PHT effect on I(NaP) inactivation rather than an open channel block, which is instead often implied. I(NaP) is inhibited by PHT only in conditions that induce major I(NaP) inactivation. These results highlight the importance of I(NaP) inactivation not only for physiological functions but also as drug target, which could be shared by other therapeutic drugs. Through this action PHT can reduce I(NaP)-induced long-lasting pathological depolarisations and intracellular sodium overload, whereas shorter I(NaP) actions should not be modified. These properties set the conditions of efficacy and the limits of PHT as I(NaP) inhibitor.

Indexed as

Analysis of VarianceAnimalsDose-Response Relationship, DrugElectric StimulationKineticsNeocortexPatch-Clamp TechniquesPhenytoinPyramidal CellsRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySodiumSodium ChannelsVoltage-Gated Sodium Channel BlockersPhenytoinSodiumSodium ChannelsVoltage-Gated Sodium Channel Blockers

Identifiers

PMID23383157
PMCPMC3558486
OpenAlexW2036059178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.