Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23383037›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2013

MTN-001: randomized pharmacokinetic cross-over study comparing tenofovir vaginal gel and oral tablets in vaginal tissue and other compartments.

Craig W Hendrix, Beatrice A Chen, Vijayanand Guddera, Craig Hoesley, Jessica Justman, Clemensia Nakabiito, Robert Salata, Lydia Soto-Torres, Karen Patterson, Alexandra M Minnis and 4 more

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 147 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
147citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00592124 phase2completednot on this map

Phase 2 Adherence and Pharmacokinetics Study of Oral and Vaginal Preparations of Tenofovir

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)Ran2008 to 2010Enrolled168ConditionsHIV InfectionsArmsTenofovir disoproxil fumarate, Tenofovir gel
NCT02995005 phase1 / phase2completednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Prevention of Mother-to-child Transmission of Hepatitis B Virus: a One Arm, Open Label Intervention Study to Estimate the Optimal Timing of Tenofovir (TDF) in Pregnancy

TypeinterventionalSponsorJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public HealthRan2018 to 2023Enrolled98ConditionsHepatitis BArmsTenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate
NCT03442192 naterminatednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

A Comparative Effectiveness Demonstration Project for Linkage and Retention in PrEP Care for Men Who Have Sex With Men (PCA)

TypeinterventionalSponsorJohns Hopkins UniversityRan2018 to 2021Enrolled20ConditionsAdherence, PatientArmsPrEP Care Anywhere Services
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

147 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

87 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Craig W HendrixDepartment of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. chendrix@jhmi.edu
Beatrice A Chen
Vijayanand Guddera
Craig Hoesley
Jessica Justman
Clemensia Nakabiito
Robert Salata
Lydia Soto-Torres
Karen Patterson
Alexandra M Minnis
Sharavi Gandham
Kailazarid Gomez
Barbra A Richardson
Namandje N Bumpus

Funding

Microbicide Trials NetworkUM1AI068633 · NIAID · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI HILLIER, SHARON L. · 2011 to 2021
$175.0M
Statistical and Data Management Center (SDMC): Microbicide Trials NetworkUM1AI068615 · NIAID · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI BROWN, ELIZABETH RENATA · 2011 to 2021
$66.5M
NIAID NIH HHS 5UM1AI068633NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI068615NIAID NIH HHS UM1AI068615NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI068633
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOral and vaginal preparations of tenofovir as pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection have demonstrated variable efficacy in men and women prompting assessment of variation in drug concentration as an explanation. Knowledge of tenofovir concentration and its active form, tenofovir diphosphate, at the putative vaginal and rectal site of action and its relationship to concentrations at multiple other anatomic locations may provide key information for both interpreting PrEP study outcomes and planning future PrEP drug development.

objectiveMTN-001 was designed to directly compare oral to vaginal steady-state tenofovir pharmacokinetics in blood, vaginal tissue, and vaginal and rectal fluid in a paired cross-over design. METHODS AND

findingsWe enrolled 144 HIV-uninfected women at 4 US and 3 African clinical research sites in an open label, 3-period crossover study of three different daily tenofovir regimens, each for 6 weeks (oral 300 mg tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, vaginal 1% tenofovir gel [40 mg], or both). Serum concentrations after vaginal dosing were 56-fold lower than after oral dosing (p<0.001). Vaginal tissue tenofovir diphosphate was quantifiable in ≥90% of women with vaginal dosing and only 19% of women with oral dosing. Vaginal tissue tenofovir diphosphate was ≥130-fold higher with vaginal compared to oral dosing (p<0.001). Rectal fluid tenofovir concentrations in vaginal dosing periods were higher than concentrations measured in the oral only dosing period (p<0.03).

conclusionsCompared to oral dosing, vaginal dosing achieved much lower serum concentrations and much higher vaginal tissue concentrations. Even allowing for 100-fold concentration differences due to poor adherence or less frequent prescribed dosing, vaginal dosing of tenofovir should provide higher active site concentrations and theoretically greater PrEP efficacy than oral dosing; randomized topical dosing PrEP trials to the contrary indicates that factors beyond tenofovir's antiviral effect substantially influence PrEP efficacy.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT00592124.

Indexed as

AdenineAdministration, OralAdolescentAdultAnti-HIV AgentsCross-Over StudiesFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMiddle AgedOrganophosphonatesPhosphorous AcidsPhosphorylationRectumTabletsTenofovir9-(2-((bis(pivaloyloxymethoxy)phosphinoyl)methoxy)propyl)adenineAdenineAnti-HIV AgentsOrganophosphonatesPhosphorous AcidsTabletsTenofovirVaginal Creams, Foams, and Jellies

Identifiers

PMID23383037
PMCPMC3559346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.