Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23382984›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

The impact of compact layer in biphasic scaffold on osteochondral tissue engineering.

Hu Da, Shuai-Jun Jia, Guo-Lin Meng, Jian-Hua Cheng, Wei Zhou, Zhuo Xiong, Yun-Jing Mu, Jian Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Application of polydopamine-modified triphasic PLA/PCL-PLGA/Mg(OH)Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Fabrication ofACS applied bio materials · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Advanced silk materials for musculoskeletal tissue regeneration.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Scaffold-Based Tissue Engineering Strategies for Osteochondral Repair.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hu DaInstitute of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Xijing Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Shuai-Jun Jia
Guo-Lin Meng
Jian-Hua Cheng
Wei Zhou
Zhuo Xiong
Yun-Jing Mu
Jian Liu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The structure of an osteochondral biphasic scaffold is required to mimic native tissue, which owns a calcified layer associated with mechanical and separation function. The two phases of biphasic scaffold should possess efficient integration to provide chondrocytes and osteocytes with an independent living environment. In this study, a novel biphasic scaffold composed of a bony phase, chondral phase and compact layer was developed. The compact layer-free biphasic scaffold taken as control group was also fabricated. The purpose of current study was to evaluate the impact of the compact layer in the biphasic scaffold. Bony and chondral phases were seeded with autogeneic osteoblast- or chondrocyte-induced bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs), respectively. The biphasic scaffolds-cells constructs were then implanted into osteochondral defects of rabbits' knees, and the regenerated osteochondral tissue was evaluated at 3 and 6 months after surgery. Anti-tensile and anti-shear properties of the compact layer-containing biphasic scaffold were significantly higher than those of the compact layer-free biphasic scaffold in vitro. Furthermore, in vivo studies revealed superior macroscopic scores, glycosaminoglycan (GAG) and collagen content, micro tomograph imaging results, and histological properties of regenerated tissue in the compact layer-containing biphasic scaffold compared to the control group. These results indicated that the compact layer could significantly enhance the biomechanical properties of biphasic scaffold in vitro and regeneration of osteochondral tissue in vivo, and thus represented a promising approach to osteochondral tissue engineering.

Indexed as

Cartilage, ArticularTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsCell SeparationMaterials TestingMesenchymal Stem CellsRabbitsRadiographyBiocompatible Materials

Identifiers

PMID23382984
PMCPMC3557302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.