ArticlePloS one2013
mTOR inhibitors alone and in combination with JAK2 inhibitors effectively inhibit cells of myeloproliferative neoplasms.
Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
61 citing papers in PubMed, 105 citations in OpenAlex.
- Targeted Therapies in Myelofibrosis: Present Landscape, Ongoing Studies, and Future Perspectives.American journal of hematology · 2025Review
- Differential regulation of mTORC2 signalling by type I and type II calreticulin (CALR) driver mutations of myeloproliferative neoplasm.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2025Article
- The Role of Mutated Calreticulin in the Pathogenesis ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Differential in vivo roles of Mpl cytoplasmic tyrosine residues in murine hematopoiesis and myeloproliferative disease.Leukemia · 2024Article
- Novel therapeutics for myelofibrosis.Blood research · 2023Review
- Review
- Recent advances in therapies for primary myelofibrosis.Faculty reviews · 2023Review
- Therapeutic effects on cancer of the active ingredients in rhizoma paridis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Review
- Novel treatments for myelofibrosis: beyond JAK inhibitors.International journal of hematology · 2022Review
- Novel strategies for challenging scenarios encountered in managing myelofibrosis.Leukemia & lymphoma · 2022Article
- JAK2 inhibitor persistence in MPN: uncovering a central role of ERK activation.Blood cancer journal · 2022Review
- JAK Be Nimble: Reviewing the Development of JAK Inhibitors and JAK Inhibitor Combinations for Special Populations of Patients with Myelofibrosis.Journal of immunotherapy and precision oncology · 2021Review
- MAPK14 over-expression is a transcriptomic feature of polycythemia vera and correlates with adverse clinical outcomes.Journal of translational medicine · 2021Article
- Disease modifying agents of myeloproliferative neoplasms: a review.Blood research · 2021Review
- Review
- Finding a Jill for JAK: Assessing Past, Present, and Future JAK Inhibitor Combination Approaches in Myelofibrosis.Cancers · 2020Review
- Management of myelofibrosis after ruxolitinib failure.Leukemia & lymphoma · 2020Article
- Polyphyllin I suppresses proliferation and promotes apoptosis of gastric cancer cell by inhibiting stat3 phosphorylation.Translational cancer research · 2020Article
- Novel agents for the treatment of polycythemia vera: an insight into preclinical research and early phase clinical trials.Expert opinion on investigational drugs · 2020Review
- STAT5 is Expressed in CD34Cancers · 2020Article
1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDysregulated signaling of the JAK/STAT pathway is a common feature of chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN), usually associated with JAK2V617F mutation. Recent clinical trials with JAK2 inhibitors showed significant improvements in splenomegaly and constitutional symptoms in patients with myelofibrosis but meaningful molecular responses were not documented. Accordingly, there remains a need for exploring new treatment strategies of MPN. A potential additional target for treatment is represented by the PI3K/AKT/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway that has been found constitutively activated in MPN cells; proof-of-evidence of efficacy of the mTOR inhibitor RAD001 has been obtained recently in a Phase I/II trial in patients with myelofibrosis. The aim of the study was to characterize the effects in vitro of mTOR inhibitors, used alone and in combination with JAK2 inhibitors, against MPN cells.
findingsMouse and human JAK2V617F mutated cell lines and primary hematopoietic progenitors from MPN patients were challenged with an allosteric (RAD001) and an ATP-competitive (PP242) mTOR inhibitor and two JAK2 inhibitors (AZD1480 and ruxolitinib). mTOR inhibitors effectively reduced proliferation and colony formation of cell lines through a slowed cell division mediated by changes in cell cycle transition to the S-phase. mTOR inhibitors also impaired the proliferation and prevented colony formation from MPN hematopoietic progenitors at doses significantly lower than healthy controls. JAK2 inhibitors produced similar antiproliferative effects in MPN cell lines and primary cells but were more potent inducers of apoptosis, as also supported by differential effects on cyclinD1, PIM1 and BcLxL expression levels. Co-treatment of mTOR inhibitor with JAK2 inhibitor resulted in synergistic activity against the proliferation of JAK2V617F mutated cell lines and significantly reduced erythropoietin-independent colony growth in patients with polycythemia vera. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: These findings support mTOR inhibitors as novel potential drugs for the treatment of MPN and advocate for clinical trials exploiting the combination of mTOR and JAK2 inhibitor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.