Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23382958›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Cdx1 and Cdx2 exhibit transcriptional specificity in the intestine.

Stephanie Grainger, Alexa Hryniuk, David Lohnes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Gastric epithelial histology and precancerous conditions.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Toxins · 2019
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Temporal and spatial expression of caudal-type homeobox proteins in the midgut of human embryos.International journal of clinical and experimental medicine · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stephanie GraingerDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Alexa Hryniuk
David Lohnes
University of Ottawa · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research MOP14412
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The caudal-related homeodomain transcription factors Cdx1 and Cdx2 are expressed in the developing endoderm with expression persisting into adulthood. Cdx1(-/-) mutants are viable and fertile and display no overt intestinal phenotype. Cdx2 null mutants are peri-implantation lethal; however, conditional mutation approaches have revealed that Cdx2 is required for patterning the intestinal epithelium and specification of the colon. Cdx2 is also necessary for homeostasis of the intestinal tract in the adult, where Cdx1 and Cdx2 appear to functionally overlap in the distal colon, but not during intestinal development. Cdx1 and Cdx2 exhibit complete overlap of expression in the intestine, although they differ in their relative levels, with Cdx1 maximal in the distal colon and Cdx2 peaking in the proximal cecum. Moreover, Cdx1 protein is graded along the crypt-villus axis, being abundant in the crypts and diminishing towards the villi. Cdx2 is expressed uniformly along this axis, but is differentially phosphorylated; the functional relevance of these expression domains and phosphorylation is currently unknown. Cdx1 and Cdx2 have been suggested to exhibit functional specificity in the intestinal tract. In the present study, using cell-based models, we found that relative to Cdx1, Cdx2 was significantly less potent at effecting a transcriptional response from the Cdx1 promoter, a known Cdx target gene. We subsequently assessed this relationship in vivo using a "gene swap" approach and found that Cdx2 cannot substitute for Cdx1 in this autoregulatory loop. This is in marked contrast with the ability of Cdx2 to support Cdx1 expression and function in paraxial mesoderm and vertebral patterning, thus providing novel in vivo evidence of context-dependent transcriptional specificity between these transcription factors.

Indexed as

AnimalsCDX2 Transcription FactorFemaleGene Expression RegulationHomeodomain ProteinsHomeostasisIntestinal MucosaIntestinesMaleMiceMice, KnockoutOrgan SpecificityPromoter Regions, GeneticProtein BindingProtein Interaction Domains and MotifsTranscription FactorsCdx1 protein, mouseCdx2 protein, mouseCDX2 Transcription FactorHomeodomain ProteinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID23382958
PMCPMC3559873
OpenAlexW2050249989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.