ArticlePloS one2013
Association of E/E' and NT-proBNP with renal function in patients with essential hypertension.
Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Longitudinal and cross-sectional associations of myocardial stress markers with kidney function and chronic kidney disease in the BiomarCaRE project.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Osteopontin associated with left ventricular hypertrophy and diastolic dysfunction in essential hypertension.Journal of human hypertension · 2020Article
- Fatigue in Nondialysis Chronic Kidney Disease: Correlates and Association with Kidney Outcomes.American journal of nephrology · 2019Article
- Echocardiographic correlates of left ventricular filling pressures and acute cardio-renal syndrome in ST segment elevation myocardial infarction patients.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2017Observational
- Utility of traditional circulating and imaging-based cardiac biomarkers in patients with predialysis CKD.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the association of left ventricular (LV) diastolic function and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) with renal function in essential hypertension.
methodsLV diastolic function was estimated by the ratio of early diastolic velocities (E) from transmitral inflow to early diastolic velocities (E') of tissue Doppler at mitral annulus (septal corner); NT-proBNP was measured in 207 hypertensive patients (mean age 56±14 years). The subjects were classified into 3 groups: E/E'≤10 group (n = 48), 10<E/E'≤15 group (n = 109) and E/E'>15 group (n = 50). The renal function was estimated by glomerular filtration rate (GFR) with (99m)Tc-DTPA. GFR from 30 to 59 ml/min/1.73 m(2) was defined as Stage 3 chronic kidney disease (CKD). GFR was also estimated using the modified MDRD equation. Albuminuria was defined by urinary albumin/creatinine ratio (UACR).
resultsGFR was lower and UACR was higher in E/E' >15 group than in 10< E/E' ≤15 group or E/E' ≤10 group (p<0.0001), GFR was significantly negative and UACR was positive correlated with E/E' and NT-proBNP (p<0.0001). In multivariate stepwise linear analysis, GFR had significant correlation with age (p = 0.001), gender (p = 0.003), E/E' (p = 0.03), lgNT-proBNP (p = 0.001) and lgUACR (p = 0.01), while eGFR had no significant correlation with E/E' or lgNT-proBNP. Multivariate logistic regression analysis, adjusted for potential confounding factors, showed that participants in E/E'>15 group were more likely to have Stage 3 CKD compared with those in E/E'≤10 group with an adjusted odds ratio of 8.31 (p = 0.0036).
conclusionsLV diastolic function, assessed with E/E' and NT-proBNP is associated with renal function in essential hypertension.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.