ArticlePloS one2013
Identifying in-trans process associated genes in breast cancer by integrated analysis of copy number and expression data.
Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.
- miR-489 induces immunogenic cell death in breast cancer by targeting LAPTM4B.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Integrating multi-omics data: Methods and applications in human complex diseases.Biotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025Review
- Bayesian inference of sample-specific coexpression networks.Genome research · 2024Article
- Functional exploration of copy number alterations in a Drosophila model of triple-negative breast cancer.Disease models & mechanisms · 2024Article
- Article
- Bayesian Optimized sample-specific Networks Obtained By Omics data (BONOBO).bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Identification of functional gene modules by integrating multi-omics data and known molecular interactions.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- Unsupervised Multi-Omics Data Integration Methods: A Comprehensive Review.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Review
- Aberrations of Chromosomes 1 and 16 in Breast Cancer: A Framework for Cooperation of Transcriptionally Dysregulated Genes.Cancers · 2021Article
- Graph- and rule-based learning algorithms: a comprehensive review of their applications for cancer type classification and prognosis using genomic data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2020Review
- Gene Co-expression Is Distance-Dependent in Breast Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Article
- Genomic data integration by WON-PARAFAC identifies interpretable factors for predicting drug-sensitivity in vivo.Nature communications · 2019Article
- Star-PAP regulates tumor protein D52 through modulating miR-449a/34a in breast cancer.Biology open · 2019Article
- Multi-omic and multi-view clustering algorithms: review and cancer benchmark.Nucleic acids research · 2018Review
- Augmentation of Physician Assessments with Multi-Omics Enhances Predictability of Drug Response: A Case Study of Major Depressive Disorder.IEEE computational intelligence magazine · 2018Article
- Integration of multiple networks and pathways identifies cancer driver genes in pan-cancer analysis.BMC genomics · 2018Article
- Genomic regression analysis of coordinated expression.Nature communications · 2017Article
- Identification of candidate genes related to pancreatic cancer based on analysis of gene co-expression and protein-protein interaction network.Oncotarget · 2017Article
- Widespread alternative exon usage in clinically distinct subtypes of Invasive Ductal Carcinoma.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- iGC-an integrated analysis package of gene expression and copy number alteration.BMC bioinformatics · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genomic copy number alterations are common in cancer. Finding the genes causally implicated in oncogenesis is challenging because the gain or loss of a chromosomal region may affect a few key driver genes and many passengers. Integrative analyses have opened new vistas for addressing this issue. One approach is to identify genes with frequent copy number alterations and corresponding changes in expression. Several methods also analyse effects of transcriptional changes on known pathways. Here, we propose a method that analyses in-cis correlated genes for evidence of in-trans association to biological processes, with no bias towards processes of a particular type or function. The method aims to identify cis-regulated genes for which the expression correlation to other genes provides further evidence of a network-perturbing role in cancer. The proposed unsupervised approach involves a sequence of statistical tests to systematically narrow down the list of relevant genes, based on integrative analysis of copy number and gene expression data. A novel adjustment method handles confounding effects of co-occurring copy number aberrations, potentially a large source of false positives in such studies. Applying the method to whole-genome copy number and expression data from 100 primary breast carcinomas, 6373 genes were identified as commonly aberrant, 578 were highly in-cis correlated, and 56 were in addition associated in-trans to biological processes. Among these in-trans process associated and cis-correlated (iPAC) genes, 28% have previously been reported as breast cancer associated, and 64% as cancer associated. By combining statistical evidence from three separate subanalyses that focus respectively on copy number, gene expression and the combination of the two, the proposed method identifies several known and novel cancer driver candidates. Validation in an independent data set supports the conclusion that the method identifies genes implicated in cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.