Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23382746›Full record

SynthesisAfrican health sciences2012

A systematic review evaluating the impact of task shifting on access to antiretroviral therapy in sub-Saharan Africa.

C A Emdin, P Millson

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in African health sciences, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

C A EmdinDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Health Science Building, 6th floor, Toronto, ON M5T 3M7, Canada. connor.emdin@utoronto.ca
P Millson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTask shifting, defined for this review as the shifting of ART initiation and management from physicians to nurses, has been proposed as a possible method to increase access to HIV treatment in Sub-Saharan Africa.

objectiveTo critically evaluate the literature on task shifting, determining if there is evidence to support this view.

methodsA systematic search of the literature was undertaken, with both peer reviewed publications and conference abstracts presenting original data eligible for inclusion. Studies were evaluated according to methodology and discussion of confounding factors.

resultsWe identified 25 articles which evaluated the effect of task shifting on access to ART. The evidence was mixed. Although there is a significant body of field reports indicating that task shifting increases access, these studies were of low methodological quality. The only randomized controlled trial included in this review did not find that task shifting increased in access.

conclusionTask shifting appears to be most effective at increasing access when combined with other interventions and financial support. There is a need for more research into the effects of task shifting policies, especially randomized controlled trials and high quality cohort studies.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityHealth WorkforceAfrica South of the SaharaAnti-HIV AgentsDelivery of Health CareDrug Administration ScheduleHIV InfectionsHumansTime FactorsAnti-HIV Agentsaccess to HIV treatmentantiretroviral therapynurse provided treatmentsubstitution of physicianstask shifting

Identifiers

PMID23382746
PMCPMC3557675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.