Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23382625›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2013

Sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy: current issues.

John K Triantafillidis, Emmanuel Merikas, Dimitrios Nikolakis, Apostolos E Papalois

5 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 5 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 122 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
122citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
24.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02039453 naunknown statusnot on this map

Safety and Efficacy of Fentanyl Versus Pethidine During Propofol-based Sedated Colonoscopy: Prospective Randomized Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorYonsei UniversityRan2013 to 2015Enrolled160ConditionsHealth Check up ColonoscopyArmsfentanyl doses, pethidine dose
NCT02767206 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of Gastroesophageal Varices in Cirrhotic and Non-cirrhotic Patients With Portal Hypertension by Transnasal Endoscopy.

TypeobservationalSponsorFederal University of Minas GeraisRan2016Enrolled50ConditionsEsophageal Varices, Gastric Varices, Hypertension Portal, Liver Cirrhosis
NCT03196479 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Comparison Between Efficacy of Ketamine and Propofol Mixture With 1:6 Ratio and 1:4 Ratio for Endoscopic Retrograde Procedure Sedation

TypeinterventionalSponsorIndonesia UniversityRan2017 to 2017Enrolled58ConditionsAdult Patients Undergoing ERCPArmsketamine and propofol mixture with 1:6 ratio, ketamine and propofol mixture with 1:4 ratio
NCT04167592 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Effectivity of Benzydamine Hydrochloride Gargle to Reduce Propofol Consumption in Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Procedure

TypeinterventionalSponsorIndonesia UniversityRan2018 to 2018Enrolled72ConditionsERCPArmsBenzydamine Hydrochloride 0.15% Oral Rinse, Water
NCT05497492 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of the Effects of Esketamine, Sufentanil, or Lidocaine Combined With Propofol on Tussis Reflection During Upper Gastroscopy: a Randomised, Two Centre, Three-blind, Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorBeijing Friendship HospitalRan2022 to 2023Enrolled400ConditionsAnesthesiaArmspropofol, propofol and sufentanil, propofol and esketamine, propofol and lidocaine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

122 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 262 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Modified Lamaze Breathing Reduces Abdominal Pain in Patients during Colonoscopy.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Etomidate Sedation for Advanced Endoscopic Procedures.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2019
    Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Clinical impact of gastroenterologist-administered propofol during esophagogastroduodenoscopy: a randomized comparison at a single medical clinic.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2015
    Trial
  20. Trial

62 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

John K TriantafillidisDepartment of Gastroenterology and Center for Inflammatory Bowel Disease, "Saint Panteleimon" General Hospital, Nikaia, 12461 Haidari, Greece. jktrian@gmail.com
Emmanuel Merikas
Dimitrios Nikolakis
Apostolos E Papalois
General Hospital of Nikea · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy can successfully be performed by applying moderate (conscious) sedation. Moderate sedation, using midazolam and an opioid, is the standard method of sedation, although propofol is increasingly being used in many countries because the satisfaction of endoscopists with propofol sedation is greater compared with their satisfaction with conventional sedation. Moreover, the use of propofol is currently preferred for the endoscopic sedation of patients with advanced liver disease due to its short biologic half-life and, consequently, its low risk of inducing hepatic encephalopathy. In the future, propofol could become the preferred sedation agent, especially for routine colonoscopy. Midazolam is the benzodiazepine of choice because of its shorter duration of action and better pharmacokinetic profile compared with diazepam. Among opioids, pethidine and fentanyl are the most popular. A number of other substances have been tested in several clinical trials with promising results. Among them, newer opioids, such as remifentanil, enable a faster recovery. The controversy regarding the administration of sedation by an endoscopist or an experienced nurse, as well as the optimal staffing of endoscopy units, continues to be a matter of discussion. Safe sedation in special clinical circumstances, such as in the cases of obese, pregnant, and elderly individuals, as well as patients with chronic lung, renal or liver disease, requires modification of the dose of the drugs used for sedation. In the great majority of patients, sedation under the supervision of a properly trained endoscopist remains the standard practice worldwide. In this review, an overview of the current knowledge concerning sedation during digestive endoscopy will be provided based on the data in the current literature.

Indexed as

Procedural SedationClinical CompetenceEndoscopy, GastrointestinalGuideline AdherenceHumansHypnotics and SedativesNurse AnesthetistsPatient SafetyPatient SelectionPersonnel Staffing and SchedulingPractice Guidelines as TopicPractice Patterns, Physicians'Risk FactorsHypnotics and SedativesAnalgesiaDigestive systemEndoscopyGastrointestinal endoscopySedation

Identifiers

PMID23382625
PMCPMC3558570
OpenAlexW2002076039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.