Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23382344›Full record

ReviewILAR journal2012

Documented and potential research impacts of subclinical diseases in zebrafish.

Michael L Kent, Claudia Harper, Jeffrey C Wolf

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ILAR journal, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Thyroid C-Cell Biology and Oncogenic Transformation.Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer · 2025
    Review
  5. Current research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Health Monitoring for Laboratory Salamanders.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Recent Advances with Fish Microsporidia.Experientia supplementum (2012) · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Zebrafish · 2021
    Article
  18. Behavioral and Reproductive Effects of Environmental Enrichment andJournal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael L KentDepartment of Microbiology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA. Michael.Kent@oregonstate.edu
Claudia Harper
Jeffrey C Wolf
Oregon State University · US

Funding

Control of Diseases in Zebrafish Research FacilitiesR24OD010998 · OD · OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI KENT, MICHAEL LAWRENCE · 2012 to 2021
$3.0M
Control of Diseases in Zebrafish Research FacilitiesR24RR017386 · NCRR · OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI KENT, MICHAEL LAWRENCE · 2003 to 2011
$1.8M
NCRR NIH HHS R24 RR017386NIH HHS R24 OD010998
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The zebrafish (Danio rerio) has become a very important animal model in biomedical research. In contrast with other models, such as mice, there has been relatively little documentation or control of subclinical disease in zebrafish research facilities. Several infectious and noninfectious conditions are consistently detected by histopathology in apparently healthy D. rerio. The most commonly observed infectious agent in zebrafish is Pseudoloma neurophilia, which is a microsporidian organism that targets the central nervous system, peripheral nerves, and occasionally other tissues. Mycobacteriosis, caused by Mycobacterium chelonae and other species, is also a frequent finding. Less commonly encountered agents include Pseudocapillaria tomentosa, which can cause extensive proliferative enteritis, and a myxozoan (Myxidium sp.) that inhabits the urinary tract but appears to cause few if any pathological changes. Noninfectious diseases that are often clinically unapparent in zebrafish include hepatic megalocytosis, bile and pancreatic ductal proliferation, and neoplasms of the ultimobranchial gland, gastrointestinal tract, and testis. To date, there is little information on the degree to which these conditions may impact research in subclinically affected fish, but there is reason to believe that they should be considered as potentially significant causes of nonprotocol variation in experiments. Therefore, it is imperative that research facilities monitor their stocks for the presence of these occult diseases and be aware of their existence when interpreting study results. Furthermore, for underlying disease conditions that cannot be readily eradicated, it is essential to determine the physiological and immunological changes that they elicit in zebrafish. Understanding the cause, modes of transmission, and distribution of the pathogens would provide useful information for the development of control and prevention strategies.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchFish DiseasesAnimalsZebrafish

Identifiers

PMID23382344
PMCPMC3703941
OpenAlexW2000276736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.