Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23382342›Full record

ReviewILAR journal2012

Microsporidiosis in zebrafish research facilities.

Justin L Sanders, Virginia Watral, Michael L Kent

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ILAR journal, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Recent Advances with Fish Microsporidia.Experientia supplementum (2012) · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Behavioral and Reproductive Effects of Environmental Enrichment andJournal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2021
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Comparison of Antemortem and Environmental Samples for Zebrafish Health Monitoring and Quarantine.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2017
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Microsporidiosis in Vertebrate Companion Exotic Animals.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Justin L SandersDepartment of Microbiology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA. justin.sanders@oregonstate.edu
Virginia Watral
Michael L Kent
Oregon State University · US

Funding

ZEBRAFISH INTERNATIONAL RESOURCE CENTERP40RR012546 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF OREGON · PI WESTERFIELD, MONTE · 1998 to 2011
$21.9M
Control of Diseases in Zebrafish Research FacilitiesR24OD010998 · OD · OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI KENT, MICHAEL LAWRENCE · 2012 to 2021
$3.0M
Control of Diseases in Zebrafish Research FacilitiesR24RR017386 · NCRR · OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI KENT, MICHAEL LAWRENCE · 2003 to 2011
$1.8M
NCRR NIH HHS 5R24RR017386-02NCRR NIH HHS P40 RR012546NCRR NIH HHS P40 RR12546-03S1NCRR NIH HHS R24 RR017386NIH HHS R24 OD010998
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pseudoloma neurophilia (Microsporidia) is the most common pathogen detected in zebrafish (Danio rerio) from research facilities. The parasite infects the central nervous system and muscle and may be associated with emaciation and skeletal deformities. However, many fish exhibit subclinical infections. Another microsporidium, Pleistophora hyphessobryconis, has recently been detected in a few zebrafish facilities. Here, we review the methods for diagnosis and detection, modes of transmission, and approaches used to control microsporidia in zebrafish, focusing on P. neurophilia. The parasite can be readily transmitted by feeding spores or infected tissues, and we show that cohabitation with infected fish is also an effective means of transmission. Spores are released from live fish in various manners, including through the urine, feces, and sex products during spawning. Indeed, P. neurophilia infects both the eggs and ovarian tissues, where we found concentrations ranging from 12,000 to 88,000 spores per ovary. Hence, various lines of evidence support the conclusion that maternal transmission is a route of infection: spores are numerous in ovaries and developing follicles in infected females, spores are present in spawned eggs and water from spawning tanks based on polymerase chain reaction tests, and larvae are very susceptible to the infection. Furthermore, egg surface disinfectants presently used in zebrafish laboratories are ineffective against microsporidian spores. At this time, the most effective method for prevention of these parasites is avoidance.

Indexed as

AnimalsFish DiseasesMicrosporidiosisPleistophoraZebrafish

Identifiers

PMID23382342
PMCPMC4117576
OpenAlexW2034223358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.