ReviewArchives of microbiology2013
Could DNA uptake be a side effect of bacterial adhesion and twitching motility?
Review in Archives of microbiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Illuminating the oral microbiome and its host interactions: tools and approaches for molecular microbiology studies.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2023Review
- Type IV Pilus-Mediated Inhibition ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2023Article
- Proteins identified through predictive metagenomics as potential biomarkers for the detection of microbiologically influenced corrosion.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2022Article
- Natural Transformation inFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Natural Competence and Horizontal Gene Transfer in Campylobacter.Current topics in microbiology and immunology · 2021Article
- Personalized Medicine for Antibiotics: The Role of Nanobiosensors in Therapeutic Drug Monitoring.Journal of personalized medicine · 2020Review
- Migration of Paraburkholderia terrae BS001 Along Old Fungal Hyphae in Soil at Various pH Levels.Microbial ecology · 2018Article
- Article
- Costs and benefits of natural transformation in Acinetobacter baylyi.BMC microbiology · 2017Article
- Presence of Extracellular DNA during Biofilm Formation by Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri Strains with Different Host Range.PloS one · 2016Article
- A unique open reading frame within the comX gene of Streptococcus mutans regulates genetic competence and oxidative stress tolerance.Molecular microbiology · 2015Article
- Different effects of MglA and MglB on pilus-mediated functions and natural competence in Thermus thermophilus.Extremophiles : life under extreme conditions · 2015Article
- Multi-serotype pneumococcal nasopharyngeal carriage prevalence in vaccine naïve Nepalese children, assessed using molecular serotyping.PloS one · 2015Article
- Natural competence and the evolution of DNA uptake specificity.Journal of bacteriology · 2014Review
- Horizontal gene transfer in the human gastrointestinal tract: potential spread of antibiotic resistance genes.Infection and drug resistance · 2014Review
- DNA-uptake machinery of naturally competent Vibrio cholerae.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
DNA acquisition promotes the spread of resistance to antibiotics and virulence among bacteria. It is also linked to several natural phenomena including recombination, genome dynamics, adaptation and speciation. Horizontal DNA transfer between bacteria occurs via conjugation, transduction or competence for natural transformation by DNA uptake. Among these, competence is the only mechanism of transformation initiated and entirely controlled by the chromosome of the recipient bacteria. While the molecular mechanisms allowing the uptake of extracellular DNA are increasingly characterized, the function of competence for natural transformation by DNA uptake, the selective advantage maintaining it and the reasons why bacteria take up DNA in the first place are still debated. In this synthesis, I review some of the literature and discuss the four hypotheses on how and why do bacteria take up DNA. I argue that DNA uptake by bacteria is an accidental by-product of bacterial adhesion and twitching motility. Adhesion and motility are generally increased in stressful conditions, which may explain why bacteria increase DNA uptake in these conditions. In addition to its fundamental scientific relevance, the new hypothesis suggested here has significant clinical implications and finds further support from the fact that antibiotics sometimes fail to eliminate the targeted bacterium while inevitably causing stress to others. The widespread misuse of antibiotics may thus not only be selecting for resistant strains, but may also be causing bacteria to take up more DNA with the consequent increase in the chances of acquiring drug resistance and virulence-a scenario in full concordance with the previously reported induction of competence genes by antibiotics in Streptococcus pneumoniae and Legionella pneumophila.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.