ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2013
Q(ST)-F(ST) comparisons: evolutionary and ecological insights from genomic heterogeneity.
Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 155 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
155 citing papers in PubMed, 426 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of population structure and stabilizing selection on quantitative genetic variation.Genetics · 2026Article
- Natural variation inScience advances · 2026Article
- Local adaptation mosaic to leaf herbivores in the annual herb Datura stramonium.Journal of plant research · 2025Article
- Foliar spectral signatures reveal adaptive divergence in live oaks (Quercus section Virentes) across species and environmental niches.The New phytologist · 2025Article
- Stronger Parental Than Temperature Effects on Methylation in Juvenile Brown Trout (Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- A method for identifying local adaptation in structured populations.PLoS genetics · 2025Article
- Pollen and anther morphological variation in rye was shaped by domestication.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Green revolution gene drives adaptation of Arabidopsis to the extremely high altitude.Science China. Life sciences · 2025Article
- Plastic responses to past environments shape adaptation to novel selection pressures.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Article
- Transcriptomic response to nitrogen availability reveals signatures of adaptive plasticity during tetraploid wheat domestication.The Plant cell · 2024Article
- Selection drives divergence of eye morphology in sympatric Heliconius butterflies.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2024Article
- Ecological trade-offs drive phenotypic and genetic differentiation of Arabidopsis thaliana in Europe.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Heritability within groups is uninformative about differences among groups: Cases from behavioral, evolutionary, and statistical genetics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Heritability within groups is uninformative about differences among groups: cases from behavioral, evolutionary, and statistical genetics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Dynamic Phytomeric Growth Contributes to Local Adaptation in Barley.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024Article
- Population genomic analysis reveals genetic divergence and adaptation inFrontiers in genetics · 2024Article
- Genetic Diversity and Phylogenetic Analysis ofGenes · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
95 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Comparative studies of the divergence of quantitative traits and neutral molecular markers, known as Q(ST)-F(ST) comparisons, provide a means for researchers to distinguish between natural selection and genetic drift as causes of population differentiation in complex polygenic traits. The use of Q(ST)-F(ST) comparisons has increased rapidly in the last few years, highlighting the utility of this approach for addressing a wide range of questions that are relevant to evolutionary and ecological genetics. These studies have also provided lessons for the design of future Q(ST)-F(ST) comparisons. Methods based on the Q(ST)-F(ST) approach could also be used to analyse various types of 'omics' data in new and revealing ways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.