ArticleInternational journal of clinical oncology2014
Analysis of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and optimal timing for prophylactic use of G-CSF in B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients treated with R-CHOP.
Article in International journal of clinical oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- A retrospective study on the analysis of influencing factors of neutropenia in endometrial cancer with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2024Article
- Effectiveness and safety of combined therapy versus monotherapy based on immune checkpoint inhibitors and/or targeted drugs as salvage treatment for advanced urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Translational cancer research · 2021Article
- Predictive value of monocytes and lymphocytes for short-term neutrophil changes in chemotherapy-induced severe neutropenia in solid tumors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFebrile neutropenia (FN) is one of the serious complications of chemotherapy. However, the hematological nadir after chemotherapy and the timing of prophylaxis for FN remain unclear, especially for outpatients.
methodsWe prospectively analyzed laboratory data from outpatients treated with a single chemotherapy regimen, rituximab (R)-CHOP, on three consultation days (days 8, 10, and 15) after chemotherapy to identify any factors that might predict the onset of the hematological nadir and the optimal timing of G-CSF prophylaxis.
resultsA total of 100 courses of chemotherapy (total 33 patients) were analyzed. Onset of the hematological nadir was not predictable in any of the patients who had a white blood cell count (WBC) of >5,500 × 10(6)/L and/or monocyte count of >80 × 10(6)/L on day 8, and thus there was little opportunity for G-CSF prophylaxis in each treatment course. Among patients who had a WBC count of 1,500-5,500 × 10(6)/L on day 8, the monocyte count on day 8 was significantly associated with the hematological nadir. Patients who had a monocyte count of <5 × 10(6)/L on day 8, were identified as a high-risk group for neutropenia for whom G-CSF administration during the current treatment course should be considered.
conclusionOur results indicate that, in outpatients receiving R-CHOP chemotherapy, the monocyte count on day 8 is a useful marker of the hematological nadir, allowing an opportunity for G-CSF prophylaxis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.