Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23380732›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2013

Pharmacodynamics and dose-response relationships of liposomal amphotericin B against different azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus isolates in a murine model of disseminated aspergillosis.

Seyedmojtaba Seyedmousavi, Willem J G Melchers, Johan W Mouton, Paul E Verweij

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2024
    Article
  5. Genetic Analyses of Amphotericin B Susceptibility inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2019
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Animal Models of Aspergillosis.Comparative medicine · 2018
    Review
  12. Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2017
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Rodent Models of Invasive Aspergillosis due toFrontiers in microbiology · 2017
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Triazole Resistance in Aspergillus spp.: A Worldwide Problem?Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2016
    Review
  17. High-Level Pan-Azole-Resistant Aspergillosis.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2015
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Antifungal pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Seyedmojtaba SeyedmousaviDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Willem J G Melchers
Johan W Mouton
Paul E Verweij
Nijmegen Institute for Scientist Practitioners in Addiction · NLRadboud University Medical Center · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The management of invasive aspergillosis (IA) has become more complicated due to the emergence of acquired azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus, which is associated with treatment failure and a mortality rate of 88%. Treatment with liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) may be a useful alternative to improve therapeutic outcome in azole-resistant IA. Four clinical A. fumigatus isolates obtained from patients with proven IA were studied in a nonneutropenic murine model of infection: a wild-type isolate without mutations in the cyp51A gene and three azole-resistant isolates harboring a single mutation at codon 220 (M220I) and tandem repeat mutations (a 34-bp tandem repeat mutation in the promoter region of the cyp51A gene in combination with substitutions at codon L98 [TR(34)/L98H] and a 46-bp tandem repeat mutation in the promoter region of the cyp51A gene in combination with mutation at codons Y121 and T289 [TR(46)/Y121F/T289A]), respectively. Female CD-1 mice were infected intravenously 24 h prior to the start of therapy. Groups of 11 mice were treated at days 1, 2, and 5 postchallenge with increasing 4-fold doses of L-AmB ranging from 0.004 to 16 mg/kg/day and observed for 14 days. Survival for all 4 isolates at day 14 was significantly better than that of controls. A dose-response relationship was observed independent of the azole resistance mechanism. The Hill-type model with a variable slope fitted the relationship between the dose and 14-day survival well for all isolates, with R(2) values of 0.95 (wild-type), 0.97 (M220I), 0.85 (TR(34)/L98H), and 0.94 (TR(46)/Y121F/T289A), respectively. Multiple logistic regression analysis confirmed that there was no significant difference between groups. The results of these experiments indicate that L-AmB was able to prolong survival in vivo in disseminated IA independent of the presence of an azole resistance mechanism in a dose-dependent manner, and therefore, they support a role for L-AmB in the treatment of azole-resistant IA.

Indexed as

Amphotericin BAnimalsAntifungal AgentsAspergillosisAspergillus fumigatusAzolesDrug Resistance, FungalFemaleFungal ProteinsMiceMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAmphotericin BAntifungal AgentsAzolesFungal Proteinsliposomal amphotericin B

Identifiers

PMID23380732
PMCPMC3623333
OpenAlexW2167583623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.