Observational studyBritish journal of sports medicine2015
Physical activity and television watching in relation to semen quality in young men.
Observational study in British journal of sports medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
58 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Global research trends on the impact of obesity on male infertility: a bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Pooled it
- Effectiveness of exercise interventions on sperm quality: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Pooled it
- Endogenous transient doping: physical exercise acutely increases testosterone levels-results from a meta-analysis.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2020Pooled it
- Coffee and caffeine intake and male infertility: a systematic review.Nutrition journal · 2017Pooled it
- The combined effect of lifestyle intervention and antioxidant therapy on sperm DNA fragmentation and seminal oxidative stress in IVF patients: a pilot study.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of UrologyTrial
- Context-dependent effects of whole-body vibration on reproductive function and penile tissue integrity in sedentary male rats.Experimental physiology · 2026Article
- Antioxidant Capacity of Seminal Plasma and Its Association with Semen Quality and Dietary Antioxidant Intake.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Preventive Effects of Tri Garn Pis Polyherbal Extract on Sexual Performance, Testicular Apoptosis, and Sperm Quality in a Dexamethasone-Induced Chronic Stress in Mice.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Treatment Options for Improving The Semen Quality in Obese Men: A Scoping Review.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Review
- Effects of high and moderate intensity exercise training on sex hormones and testicular damage induced by cisplatin in rats.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Impact of physical activity on semen quality: a review of current evidence.Asian journal of andrology · 2025Review
- Association of oxidative balance score with incident cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes: findings of the UK Biobank study.European journal of nutrition · 2025Article
- Observational
- Can lifestyle changes significantly improve male fertility: A narrative review?Arab journal of urology · 2025Review
- The influence of lifestyle and biological factors on semen variability.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024Article
- Do Exercise and Magnesium Sulfate Improve Infertility Caused by Lithium Carbonate in Male Rats?Advanced biomedical research · 2024Article
- Longitudinal trends and correlation between autism spectrum disorder prevalence and sperm quality parameters (2000-2024): a comprehensive statistical analysis.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2024Article
- Male infertility.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2023Review
- Recreational Drug Misuse and Its Potential Contribution to Male Fertility Levels' Decline: A Narrative Review.Brain sciences · 2022Review
- [Impact of lifestyle and environmental factors on male reproductive health].Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSemen quality appears to have declined over the past decades but reasons for this decline are unresolved. The concurrent increase in sedentary behaviour may be a contributing factor. The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship of physical activity and television (TV) watching with sperm parameters in a population of young, healthy men.
methodsMen aged 18-22 years (n=189) from the Rochester Young Men's Study (2009-2010) participated in this analysis. Physical activity (h/week of moderate and vigorous exercise) and TV watching (h/week of TV, video or DVD watching) over the past 3 months were assessed via questionnaire. Semen quality was assessed by sperm concentration, motility, morphology and total sperm count.
resultsSperm concentration and total sperm count were directly related to physical activity after multivariable adjustment (p-trend=0.01 and 0.04); men in the highest quartile of moderate-to-vigorous activity (≥15 h/week) had 73% (95% CI 15% to 160%) higher sperm concentration than men in the lowest quartile (<5 h/week). TV watching was inversely associated with sperm concentration and total sperm count in multivariable analyses (p-trend=0.05 and 0.06); men in the highest quartile of TV watching (>20 h/week) had 44% (95% CI 15 to 63%) lower sperm concentration than men in the lowest quartile (0 h/week). These measures of physical and leisure time activities were not significantly associated with sperm motility or morphology.
conclusionsIn this population of healthy men, higher moderate-to-vigorous activity and less TV watching were significantly associated with higher total sperm count and sperm concentration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.