ArticleBMC psychiatry2013
Development and psychometric properties of a five-language multiperspective instrument to assess clinical decision making style in the treatment of people with severe mental illness (CDMS).
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Information and decision-making needs among people with mental disorders: a systematic review of the literature.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2015Pooled it
- A Smartphone App to Promote Patient Activation and Support Shared Decision-making in People With a Diagnosis of Schizophrenia in Outpatient Treatment Settings (Momentum Trial): Randomized Controlled Assessor-Blinded Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Trial
- Cross-cultural validation of the patient-practitioner orientation scale among primary care professionals in Spain.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021Trial
- Trial
- Factor structure of the autonomy preference index in people with severe mental illness.Psychiatry research · 2015Trial
- Preferences for Decision-Making Style and Knowledge of and Attitudes To Recovery in Mental Health Professionals Working in Inpatient and Outpatient Settings in Routine Mental Health Practice: An Exploratory Cross-Sectional Study in the Danish Mental Health Services.Administration and policy in mental health · 2026Article
- Arabic translation and psychometric validation of the Problem-Solving Decision-Making scale: A cross-sectional study in Saudi Arabia.PloS one · 2026Article
- Which questionnaires can be used to elicit patients' preferences regarding patient-provider consultations? Results of a scoping review.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Measuring healthcare professionals' perceptions of their ability to adopt shared decision making: Translation and psychometric evaluation of the Danish version of the IcanSDM questionnaire.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Article
- Exploring Patient Empowerment in Major Depressive Disorder: Correlations of Trust, Active Role in Shared Decision-Making, and Symptomatology in a Sample of Italian Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Path Analysis of Health Literacy, Social Support, and Self-Efficacy on Decisional Conflict in Patients with Stable Schizophrenia.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2024Article
- Clinical decision-making style preferences of European psychiatrists: Results from the Ambassadors survey in 38 countries.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2022Review
- Article
- When does shared decision making is adopted in psychiatric clinical practice? Results from a European multicentric study.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2020Observational
- The development and evaluation of a computerized decision aid for the treatment of psychotic disorders.BMC psychiatry · 2018Article
- Implementing shared decision making in routine mental health care.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2017Article
- [Social psychiatry and neurobiology : A long overdue convergence exemplified by schizophrenia].Der Nervenarzt · 2017Review
- Recovery and decision-making involvement in people with severe mental illness from six countries: a prospective observational study.BMC psychiatry · 2017Observational
- Clinical decision making and outcome in the routine care of people with severe mental illness across Europe (CEDAR).Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences · 2016Article
- Information and Decision-Making Needs Among People with Anxiety Disorders: Results of an Online Survey.The patient · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this study was to develop and evaluate psychometric properties of the Clinical Decision Making Style (CDMS) scale which measures general preferences for decision making as well as preferences regarding the provision of information to the patient from the perspectives of people with severe mental illness and staff.
methodsA participatory approach was chosen for instrument development which followed 10 sequential steps proposed in a current guideline of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation of measures. Following item analysis, reliability, validity, and long-term stability of the CDMS were examined using Spearman correlations in a sample of 588 people with severe mental illness and 213 mental health professionals in 6 European countries (Germany, UK, Italy, Denmark, Hungary, and Switzerland).
resultsIn both patient and staff versions, the two CDMS subscales "Participation in Decision Making" and "Information" reliably measure distinct characteristics of decision making. Validity could be demonstrated to some extent, but needs further investigation.
conclusionsTogether with two other five-language patient- and staff-rated measures developed in the CEDAR study (ISRCTN75841675) - "Clinical Decision Making in Routine Care" and "Clinical Decision Making Involvement and Satisfaction" - the CDMS allows empirical investigation of the complex relation between clinical decision making and outcome in the treatment of people with severe mental illness across Europe.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.