Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23378959›Full record

ArticleNorth American journal of medical sciences2013

Brainstem auditory evoked potential abnormalities in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Sharat Gupta, Pooja Baweja, Shallu Mittal, Avnish Kumar, Kamal D Singh, Raghuvansh Sharma

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in North American journal of medical sciences, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Auditory Late Latency Response in Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.The journal of international advanced otology · 2018
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sharat GuptaDepartment of Physiology, Gian Sagar Medical College, Ramnagar, Punjab, India.
Pooja Baweja
Shallu Mittal
Avnish Kumar
Kamal D Singh
Raghuvansh Sharma
Government Medical College · INGian Sagar Medical College and Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiabetes mellitus represents a syndrome complex in which multiple organ systems, including the central nervous system, are affected.

aimThe study was conducted to determine the changes in the brainstem auditory evoked potentials in type 2 diabetes mellitus. MATERIALS AND

methodsA cross sectional study was conducted on 126 diabetic males, aged 35-50 years, and 106 age-matched, healthy male volunteers. Brainstem auditory evoked potentials were recorded and the results were analyzed statistically using student's unpaired t-test. The data consisted of wave latencies I, II, III, IV, V and interpeak latencies I-III, III-V and I-V, separately for both ears.

resultsThe latency of wave IV was significantly delayed only in the right ear, while the latency of waves III, V and interpeak latencies III-V, I-V showed a significant delay bilaterally in diabetic males. However, no significant difference was found between diabetic and control subjects as regards to the latency of wave IV unilaterally in the left ear and the latencies of waves I, II and interpeak latency I-III bilaterally.

conclusionDiabetes patients have an early involvement of central auditory pathway, which can be detected with fair accuracy with auditory evoked potential studies.

Indexed as

Brainstem dysfunctionDiabetesDiabetic neuropathyInterpeak latencySensorineural hearing lossWave latency

Identifiers

PMID23378959
PMCPMC3560142
OpenAlexW2144372036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.