Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23378590›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology2013

DNA base damage by reactive oxygen species, oxidizing agents, and UV radiation.

Jean Cadet, J Richard Wagner

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 373 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
373citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

373 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Oxidation Products of S-Adenosyl Methionine Probed by Infrared Multiple Photon Dissociation Spectroscopy.Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. DNA damage and repair in cardiomyopathy: mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2026
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

313 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jean CadetDirection des Sciences de la Matière, Institut Nanosciences et Cryogénie, CEA/Grenoble, 38054 Grenoble, France. jean.cadet@cea.fr
J Richard Wagner

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emphasis has been placed in this article dedicated to DNA damage on recent aspects of the formation and measurement of oxidatively generated damage in cellular DNA in order to provide a comprehensive and updated survey. This includes single pyrimidine and purine base lesions, intrastrand cross-links, purine 5',8-cyclonucleosides, DNA-protein adducts and interstrand cross-links formed by the reactions of either the nucleobases or the 2-deoxyribose moiety with the hydroxyl radical, one-electron oxidants, singlet oxygen, and hypochlorous acid. In addition, recent information concerning the mechanisms of formation, individual measurement, and repair-rate assessment of bipyrimidine photoproducts in isolated cells and human skin upon exposure to UVB radiation, UVA photons, or solar simulated light is critically reviewed.

Indexed as

DNA DamageUltraviolet RaysChromatography, High Pressure LiquidDNA AdductsMass SpectrometryNucleotidesOxidation-ReductionReactive Oxygen SpeciesDNA AdductsNucleotidesReactive Oxygen Species

Identifiers

PMID23378590
PMCPMC3552502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.