ReviewMicrobiology (Reading, England)2013
An update on the molecular genetics toolbox for staphylococci.
Review in Microbiology (Reading, England), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- The application of CRISPR-Cas system inHeliyon · 2024Article
- Article
- Recombineering in Staphylococcus aureus.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Genetic Determinants Enabling Medium-Dependent Adaptation to Nafcillin in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus.mSystems · 2020Article
- Repression of Capsule Production by XdrA and CodY in Staphylococcus aureus.Journal of bacteriology · 2018Article
- Antibiotic Combinations That Enable One-Step, Targeted Mutagenesis of Chromosomal Genes.ACS infectious diseases · 2018Article
- Phage Therapy: What Have We Learned?Viruses · 2018Review
- Article
- Tailor-made gene silencing of Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates by CRISPR interference.PloS one · 2018Article
- Construction of a Gene Knockdown System Based on Catalytically Inactive ("Dead") Cas9 (dCas9) in Staphylococcus aureus.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2017Article
- The development of fluorescent protein tracing vectors for multicolor imaging of clinically isolated Staphylococcus aureus.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Generation of a Stable Plasmid forApplied and environmental microbiology · 2016Article
- Genetic engineering of untransformable coagulase-negative staphylococcal pathogens.Nature protocols · 2016Article
- New shuttle vector-based expression system to generate polyhistidine-tagged fusion proteins in Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2015Article
- Article
- Reconstruction of mreB expression in Staphylococcus aureus via a collection of new integrative plasmids.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Staphylococci are Gram-positive spherical bacteria of enormous clinical and biotechnological relevance. Staphylococcus aureus has been extensively studied as a model pathogen. A plethora of methods and molecular tools has been developed for genetic modification of at least ten different staphylococcal species to date. Here we review recent developments of various genetic tools and molecular methods for staphylococcal research, which include reporter systems and vectors for controllable gene expression, gene inactivation, gene essentiality testing, chromosomal integration and transposon delivery. It is furthermore illustrated how mutant strain construction by homologous or site-specific recombination benefits from sophisticated counterselection methods. The underlying genetic components have been shown to operate in wild-type staphylococci or modified chassis strains. Finally, possible future developments in the field of applied Staphylococcus genetics are highlighted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.