ArticleCurrent treatment options in cardiovascular medicine2013
Diagnosis and management of vertebrobasilar insufficiency.
Article in Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- An anatomical study of anterior spinal artery patterns in the Thai population.Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA · 2026Article
- Premorbid Comorbidities as Predictors of Outcome in Ischemic Posterior Fossa Stroke: A Retrospective Evaluation Using the Age-Adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Bow hunter's syndrome successfully treated with a posterior surgical decompression approach: A case report and review of literature.World journal of clinical cases · 2022Article
- Observational
- Rare Etiology of Bow Hunter's Syndrome and Systematic Review of Literature.Journal of vascular and interventional neurology · 2015Article
- Relationship of the changes of cervical MRI, TCD and BAEP in patients with "isolated" vertigo.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
opinion statementUnderstanding the anatomical pathways and clinical presentations for VBI are of the utmost importance due to the potential mimics that may occur. After identification of the entity, imaging must be performed to identify the etiology. Distinguishing external compression of the vertebral artery from intrinsic vascular disease due to atherosclerosis or dissection is critical to aid the clinician in the therapeutic decision tree. Patients with an external compression due to an osteophyte may benefit from definitive surgical decompression and excision of the bony structure. Patients with extracranial disease of the vertebral artery who have failed maximal medical therapy may benefit from angioplasty and stenting which appears to carry a low morbidity. Extracranial vertebral artery dissections can be treated with medical therapy using anti-platelet agents or on occasion anti-coagulation. Rarely, endovascular options are required if a patient is having hemodynamic stroke or TIAs due to flow failure. In such circumstances, stenting and angioplasty may be considered. Intracranial atherosclerosis is best managed with maximal medical therapy due to the high rate of complications attributable to stenting and angioplasty.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.