ArticleEuropean radiology2013
Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for characterising nasopharyngeal carcinoma: comparison of semiquantitative and quantitative parameters and correlation with tumour stage.
Article in European radiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed.
- Consistency of T2WI-FS/ASL fusion images in delineating the volume of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Scientific reports · 2015Trial
- Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging-based radiomics for predicting programmed death ligand 1 expression in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Alterations in the Temporal Variation and Spatial Distribution of Blood-Brain Barrier Permeability Following Electromagnetic Pulse Radiation: A Study Based on Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Time-Intensity Curve Analysis of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Non-Ossified Thyroid Cartilage Invasion in Laryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2025Article
- Quantitative Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Positron Emission Tomography (PET) for Distinguishing Metastatic Lymph Nodes from Nonmetastatic Among Patients with Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.World journal of nuclear medicine · 2025Article
- Histogram analysis of quantitative parameters from synthetic MRI: correlations with prognostic factors in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.European radiology · 2023Article
- Clinical indications and acquisition protocol for the use of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in head and neck cancer squamous cell carcinoma: recommendations from an expert panel.Insights into imaging · 2022Article
- The correlations between dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and immunohistochemical data in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas.Turkish journal of medical sciences · 2022Article
- Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI predicts PTEN protein expression which can function as a prognostic measure of progression-free survival in NPC patients.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2022Article
- The value of intravoxel incoherent motion model-based diffusion-weighted imaging for predicting long-term outcomes in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Tumor Blood Flow Is a Predictor of Radiotherapy Response in Patients With Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Nasopharyngeal carcinoma perfusion MRI: Comparison of arterial spin labeling and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.Medicine · 2020Article
- Quantitative Analysis of DCE-MRI and RESOLVE-DWI for Differentiating Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma from Nasopharyngeal Lymphoid Hyperplasia.Journal of medical systems · 2020Article
- Observational
- Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Differentiating Between Primary Tumor, Metastatic Node and Normal Tissue in Head and Neck Cancer.Current medical imaging reviews · 2018Article
- Grading of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms using pharmacokinetic parameters derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.Oncology letters · 2018Article
- Contrast-enhanced dynamic and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 T to assess early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Oncology letters · 2018Article
- Tumor Segmentation in Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Deep Learning with Convolutional Neural Network.BioMed research international · 2018Article
- Intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: comparison and correlation with dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging.Oncotarget · 2017Article
- Differentiation between Treatment-Induced Necrosis and Recurrent Tumors in Patients with Metastatic Brain Tumors: Comparison amongAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) for characterising nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).
methodsForty-five newly diagnosed NPC patients were recruited. The initial enhancement rate (E R ), contrast transfer rate (k ep ), elimination rate (k el ), maximal enhancement (MaxEn) and initial area under the curve (iAUC) were calculated from semiquantitative analysis. The K (trans) (volume transfer constant), v e (volume fraction) and k ep were calculated from quantitative analysis. Student's t-test was used to evaluate the differences among tumour stages. Pearson's correlation between the two sets of k ep was performed.
resultsComparing tumours of T1/2 stage (n = 18) and T3/4 stage (n = 27), MaxEn (P = 0.030) and iAUC (P = 0.039) were both significantly different; however, the iAUC was the only independent variable with 69.6 % sensitivity and 76.5 % specificity respectively; v e was also significantly different (P = 0.010) with 69.6 % sensitivity and 70.6 % specificity respectively. No significant difference was found among N stages. The two sets of k ep s were highly correlated (r = 0.809, P < 0.001). Forty-three patients had chemoradiation, one palliative chemotherapy and one radiotherapy only. In the four patients with poor outcome, k el, E R, MaxEn and iAUC tended to be higher.
conclusionsNeovasculature in higher T stage NPC exhibits some parameters of increased permeability and perfusion. Thus, DCE-MRI may be helpful as an adjunctive technique in evaluating NPC. KEY POINTS: • The correct assessment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is important for planning treatment. • Neovasculature in higher T stage NPC exhibits increased permeability and perfusion. • Correlation between quantitative and semi-quantitative analysis validates the robustness of DCE-MRI. • DCE-MRI may be helpful as an adjunctive parameter in evaluating NPC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
23377545What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.