ArticleLasers in medical science2013
Optimal treatment opportunity for mTHPC-mediated photodynamic therapy of liver cancer.
Article in Lasers in medical science, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided interventional treatment for refractory malignant left-sided liver tumors: a case series of 26 patients.Scientific reports · 2016Trial
- Photodynamic therapy: A next alternative treatment strategy for hepatocellular carcinoma?World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2021Article
- Effects of meta-tetrahydroxyphenylchlorin photodynamic therapy on isogenic colorectal cancer SW480 and SW620 cells with different metastatic potentials.Lasers in medical science · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been clinically used for liver cancer. The pharmacokinetics of a photosensitizer needs to be monitored so that PDT can be performed at the most favorable time and with the proper dose to increase the cure rate. As mTHPC is a fluorescent compound, we investigate its pharmacokinetics, distribution, and elimination in the rat orthotropic liver cancer model in order to confirm an optimal treatment opportunity of liver cancer PDT. After intravenous administration at a single dose of 300 μg/kg, mTHPC was extracted from tissue homogenates or plasma. Then, mTHPC concentrations were assessed by fluorescence spectroscopy and the data were processed with PK-GRAPH pharmacokinetic procedure. The plasma concentration-time profile of mTHPC showed a short distribution half-life (T½α = 0.082 h) and a relatively longer elimination half-life (T½β = 28.23 h), which quite fitted with a two-compartment model. The results of mTHPC tissue distributions showed that the highest drug accumulation was in tumor tissue, and successively decreased in liver, heart, spleen, muscle, and skin tissues. The drug distribution ratio of tumor to normal tissue reached the peak at 24 h after mTHPC administration. mTHPC was eliminated at a suitable rate in rat orthotropic liver cancer model, and there was no long-term accumulation of mTHPC in rat tissues. For PDT of orthotropic liver cancer, 24 h after mTHPC intravenous injection may be the optimal treatment time point, which might provide higher clinical efficacy and reduce side effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.