Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23376737›Full record

ReviewNeuroscience2014

Epigenetic mechanisms in mood disorders: targeting neuroplasticity.

D M Fass, F A Schroeder, R H Perlis, S J Haggarty

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Cognitive Function and Quality of Life in Vorinostat-Treated Patients after Matched Unrelated Donor Myeloablative Conditioning Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2019
    Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Individual differences in social homeostasis.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Epigenetic Activation ofFrontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Immune signatures and disorder-specific patterns in a cross-disorder gene expression analysis.The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science · 2016
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

D M FassDepartment of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Center for Human Genetic Reseach, 185 Cambridge Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, 7 Cambridge Center, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA.
F A SchroederDepartment of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Center for Human Genetic Reseach, 185 Cambridge Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, 149, 13th Street, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA.
R H PerlisStanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, 7 Cambridge Center, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Center for Human Genetic Research, 185 Cambridge Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
S J HaggartyDepartment of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Center for Human Genetic Reseach, 185 Cambridge Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, 7 Cambridge Center, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Center for Human Genetic Research, 185 Cambridge Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA. Electronic address: haggarty@chgr.mgh.harvard.edu.
Center for Human Genetics · USBroad Institute · USMassachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

Small-molecule probes of chromatin-mediated neuroplasticityR01DA028301 · NIDA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI HAGGARTY, STEPHEN J · 2009 to 2013
$3.0M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA028301
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Developing novel therapeutics and diagnostic tools based upon an understanding of neuroplasticity is critical in order to improve the treatment and ultimately the prevention of a broad range of nervous system disorders. In the case of mood disorders, such as major depressive disorder (MDD) and bipolar disorder (BPD), where diagnoses are based solely on nosology rather than pathophysiology, there exists a clear unmet medical need to advance our understanding of the underlying molecular mechanisms and to develop fundamentally new mechanism experimental medicines with improved efficacy. In this context, recent preclinical molecular, cellular, and behavioral findings have begun to reveal the importance of epigenetic mechanisms that alter chromatin structure and dynamically regulate patterns of gene expression that may play a critical role in the pathophysiology of mood disorders. Here, we will review recent advances involving the use of animal models in combination with genetic and pharmacological probes to dissect the underlying molecular mechanisms and neurobiological consequence of targeting this chromatin-mediated neuroplasticity. We discuss evidence for the direct and indirect effects of mood stabilizers, antidepressants, and antipsychotics, among their many other effects, on chromatin-modifying enzymes and on the epigenetic state of defined genomic loci, in defined cell types and in specific regions of the brain. These data, as well as findings from patient-derived tissue, have also begun to reveal alterations of epigenetic mechanisms in the pathophysiology and treatment of mood disorders. We summarize growing evidence supporting the notion that selectively targeting chromatin-modifying complexes, including those containing histone deacetylases (HDACs), provides a means to reversibly alter the acetylation state of neuronal chromatin and beneficially impact neuronal activity-regulated gene transcription and mood-related behaviors. Looking beyond current knowledge, we discuss how high-resolution, whole-genome methodologies, such as RNA-sequencing (RNA-Seq) for transcriptome analysis and chromatin immunoprecipitation-sequencing (ChIP-Seq) for analyzing genome-wide occupancy of chromatin-associated factors, are beginning to provide an unprecedented view of both specific genomic loci as well as global properties of chromatin in the nervous system. These methodologies when applied to the characterization of model systems, including those of patient-derived induced pluripotent cell (iPSC) and induced neurons (iNs), will greatly shape our understanding of epigenetic mechanisms and the impact of genetic variation on the regulatory regions of the human genome that can affect neuroplasticity. Finally, we point out critical unanswered questions and areas where additional data are needed in order to better understand the potential to target mechanisms of chromatin-mediated neuroplasticity for novel treatments of mood and other psychiatric disorders.

Indexed as

Chromatin Assembly and DisassemblyEpigenesis, GeneticAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalHumansMiceMood DisordersNeuronal PlasticityRatschromatinepigeneticsexperimental medicinemood disordersneuroplasticity

Identifiers

PMID23376737
PMCPMC3830721
OpenAlexW2014559152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.