Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23376143›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of urology2013

Stress incontinence in the era of regenerative medicine: reviewing the importance of the pudendal nerve.

Bradley C Gill, Margot S Damaser, Sandip P Vasavada, Howard B Goldman

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of urology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bradley C GillGlickman Urological and Kidney Institute and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA.
Margot S Damaser
Sandip P Vasavada
Howard B Goldman
Case Western Reserve University · USCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine · US

Funding

MECHANISMS OF INCONTINENCE FOLLOWING VAGINAL DISTENSIONR01HD038679 · NICHD · LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO · PI DAMASER, MARGOT S. · 2000 to 2010
$2.7M
Stem Cell Homing for Treatment of Female Pelvic Floor DisordersR01HD059859 · NICHD · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI DAMASER, MARGOT S. · 2010 to 2014
$1.6M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD038679NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD059859NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD38679
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRegenerative medicine will likely facilitate improved stress urinary incontinence treatment via the restoration of its neurogenic, myogenic and structural etiologies. Understanding these pathophysiologies and how each can optimally benefit from cellular, molecular and minimally invasive therapies will become necessary. While stem cells in sphincteric deficiency dominate the regenerative urology literature, little has been published on pudendal nerve regeneration or other regenerative targets. We discuss regenerative therapies for pudendal nerve injury in stress urinary incontinence. MATERIALS AND

methodsA PubMed® search for pudendal nerve combined individually with regeneration, injury, electrophysiology, measurement and activity produced a combined but nonindependent 621 results. English language articles were reviewed by title for relevance, which identified a combined but nonindependent 68 articles. A subsequent Google Scholar™ search and a review of the references of the articles obtained aided in broadening the discussion.

resultsElectrophysiological studies have associated pudendal nerve dysfunction with stress urinary incontinence clinically and assessed pudendal nerve regeneration functionally, while animal models have provided physiological insight. Stem cell treatment has improved continence clinically, and ex vivo sphincteric bulk and muscle function gains have been noted in the laboratory. Stem cells, neurotrophic factors and electrical stimulation have benefited pudendal nerve regeneration in animal models.

conclusionsMost regenerative studies to date have focused on stem cells restoring sphincteric function and bulk but whether a sphincter denervated by pudendal nerve injury will benefit is unclear. Pudendal nerve regeneration appears possible through minimally invasive therapies that show significant clinical potential. Treating poor central control and coordination of the neuromuscular continence mechanism remains another challenge.

Indexed as

Brain-Derived Neurotrophic FactorCholinergic AntagonistsElectromyographyExercise TherapyFemaleHumansNerve RegenerationPudendal NerveRecovery of FunctionRegenerative MedicineRisk AssessmentSeverity of Illness IndexStem Cell TransplantationTreatment OutcomeUrinary Incontinence, StressUrodynamicsBrain-Derived Neurotrophic FactorCholinergic Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID23376143
PMCPMC4158918
OpenAlexW2030789949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.