Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23376018›Full record

ReviewHearing research2013

Effects of sensorineural hearing loss on temporal coding of narrowband and broadband signals in the auditory periphery.

Kenneth S Henry, Michael G Heinz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Hearing research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Does the Speech Cue Profile Affect Response to Amplitude Envelope Distortion?Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The chinchilla animal model for hearing science and noise-induced hearing loss.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2019
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kenneth S HenryDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Purdue University, 500 Oval Drive, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
Michael G Heinz

Funding

Effects of Sensorineural Hearing Loss on Robust Speech CodingR01DC009838 · NIDCD · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI Michael G Heinz · 2009 to 2026
$6.1M
Effects of noise-induced and metabolic hearing losses on temporal coding in noiseF32DC012236 · NIDCD · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI HENRY, KENNETH STUART · 2012 to 2013
$87k
NIDCD NIH HHS F32 DC012236NIDCD NIH HHS F32-DC012236NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009838NIDCD NIH HHS R01-DC009838
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People with sensorineural hearing loss have substantial difficulty understanding speech under degraded listening conditions. Behavioral studies suggest that this difficulty may be caused by changes in auditory processing of the rapidly-varying temporal fine structure (TFS) of acoustic signals. In this paper, we review the presently known effects of sensorineural hearing loss on processing of TFS and slower envelope modulations in the peripheral auditory system of mammals. Cochlear damage has relatively subtle effects on phase locking by auditory-nerve fibers to the temporal structure of narrowband signals under quiet conditions. In background noise, however, sensorineural loss does substantially reduce phase locking to the TFS of pure-tone stimuli. For auditory processing of broadband stimuli, sensorineural hearing loss has been shown to severely alter the neural representation of temporal information along the tonotopic axis of the cochlea. Notably, auditory-nerve fibers innervating the high-frequency part of the cochlea grow increasingly responsive to low-frequency TFS information and less responsive to temporal information near their characteristic frequency (CF). Cochlear damage also increases the correlation of the response to TFS across fibers of varying CF, decreases the traveling-wave delay between TFS responses of fibers with different CFs, and can increase the range of temporal modulation frequencies encoded in the periphery for broadband sounds. Weaker neural coding of temporal structure in background noise and degraded coding of broadband signals along the tonotopic axis of the cochlea are expected to contribute considerably to speech perception problems in people with sensorineural hearing loss. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled "Annual Reviews 2013".

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAnimalsAuditory PerceptionCochleaCochlear NerveHearing Loss, SensorineuralHumansSpeech PerceptionANauditory nerveCFcharacteristic frequencyENVenvelopeFMfrequency modulationsound pressure levelSPLspontaneous rateSRtemporal fine structureTFS

Identifiers

PMID23376018
PMCPMC3688697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.