Trial reportArthritis research & therapy2013
Rilonacept in the treatment of acute gouty arthritis: a randomized, controlled clinical trial using indomethacin as the active comparator.
Trial report in Arthritis research & therapy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00855920 (A Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Rilonacept Administered Subcutaneously for the Treatment of an Acute Gout Flare), which is not on this map. Cited by 54 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Rilonacept Administered Subcutaneously for the Treatment of an Acute Gout Flare
Who cites it
54 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 120 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interleukin-1β inhibitors for the management of acute gout flares: a systematic literature review.Arthritis research & therapy · 2023Pooled it
- Interventions for reducing inflammation in familial Mediterranean fever.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Systematic Review of Safety and Efficacy of IL-1-Targeted Biologics in Treating Immune-Mediated Disorders.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Pooled it
- Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for acute gout.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Efficacy and Safety of Pharmacologic Interventions in Patients Experiencing a Gout Flare: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Arthritis care & research · 2021Pooled it
- 2020 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Management of Gout.Arthritis care & research · 2020Guideline
- Risk of Infections and Cancer in Patients With Rheumatologic Diseases Receiving Interleukin Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA network open · 2019Pooled it
- A systematic literature review of patient-reported outcome measures used in gout: an evaluation of their content and measurement properties.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2019Pooled it
- Interventions for reducing inflammation in familial Mediterranean fever.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- [Full version of the S2e guidelines on gouty arthritis : Evidence-based guidelines of the German Society of Rheumatology (DGRh)].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2016Guideline
- Interleukin-1 inhibitors for acute gout.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
- Trial
- Trial
- Comparison of Prednisolone, Etoricoxib, and Indomethacin in Treatment of Acute Gouty Arthritis: An Open-Label, Randomized, Controlled Trial.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2016Trial
- Firsekibart versus compound betamethasone in acute gout patients unsuitable for standard therapy: A randomized phase 3 trial.Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)) · 2025Article
- WN1703 alleviates gout symptoms via inflammatory signaling pathways in an acute gout rat model.Pharmaceutical science advances · 2024Article
- IL-1 Receptor Dynamics in Immune Cells: Orchestrating Immune Precision and Balance.Immune network · 2024Review
- Clinical Utility of Rilonacept for the Treatment of Recurrent Pericarditis: Design, Development, and Place in Therapy.Drug design, development and therapy · 2024Review
- The Hong Kong Society of Rheumatology consensus recommendations for the management of gout.Clinical rheumatology · 2023Review
- MiRNA-23a-5p is the biomarkers for gouty arthritis and promotes inflammation in rats of gouty arthritis via MyD88/NF-κB pathway by induction TLR2.Archives of rheumatology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIn phase-3 clinical trials, the interleukin (IL-1) blocker, rilonacept (IL-1 Trap), demonstrated efficacy for gout flare prevention during initiation of urate-lowering therapy. This trial evaluated rilonacept added to a standard-of-care, indomethacin, for treatment of acute gout flares.
methodsAdults, aged 18-70 years, with gout presenting within 48 hours of flare onset and having at least moderate pain as well as swelling and tenderness in the index joint were randomized to subcutaneous (SC) rilonacept 320 mg at baseline plus oral indomethacin 50 mg TID for 3 days followed by 25 mg TID for up to 9 days (n = 74); SC placebo at baseline plus oral indomethacin as above (n=76); or SC rilonacept 320 mg at baseline plus oral placebo (n=75). The primary efficacy endpoint was change in pain in the index joint (patient-reported using a Likert scale (0=none; 4=extreme)) from baseline to the average of values at 24, 48 and 72 hours (composite time point) for rilonacept plus indomethacin versus indomethacin alone. Comparison of rilonacept monotherapy with indomethacin monotherapy was dependent on demonstration of significance for the primary endpoint. Safety evaluation included clinical laboratory and adverse event (AE) assessments.
resultsPatient characteristics were comparable among the groups; the population was predominantly male (94.1%), white (75.7%), with mean±SD age of 50.3±10.6 years. All treatment groups reported within-group pain reductions from baseline (P<0.0001). Although primary endpoint pain reduction was greater with rilonacept plus indomethacin (-1.55±0.92) relative to indomethacin alone (-1.40±0.96), the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.33), so formal comparison between monotherapy groups was not performed. Pain reduction over the 72-hour period with rilonacept alone (-0.69±0.97) was less than that in the other groups, but pain reduction was similar among groups at 72 hours. Treatment with rilonacept was well-tolerated with no reported serious AEs related to rilonacept. Across all groups, the most frequent AEs were headache and dizziness.
conclusionsAlthough generally well-tolerated, rilonacept in combination with indomethacin and rilonacept alone did not provide additional pain relief over 72 hours relative to indomethacin alone in patients with acute gout flare.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov registration number NCT00855920.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.