Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23375025›Full record

Trial reportArthritis research & therapy2013

Rilonacept in the treatment of acute gouty arthritis: a randomized, controlled clinical trial using indomethacin as the active comparator.

Robert A Terkeltaub, H Ralph Schumacher, John D Carter, Herbert S B Baraf, Robert R Evans, Jian Wang, Shirletta King-Davis, Steven P Weinstein

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Arthritis research & therapy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00855920 (A Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Rilonacept Administered Subcutaneously for the Treatment of an Acute Gout Flare), which is not on this map. Cited by 54 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00855920 phase3completednot on this map

A Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Rilonacept Administered Subcutaneously for the Treatment of an Acute Gout Flare

TypeinterventionalSponsorRegeneron PharmaceuticalsRan2009 to 2010Enrolled225ConditionsAcute Gout FlareArmsRilonacept, Indomethacin, Placebo (for Indomethacin), Placebo (for Rilonacept)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 120 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Interventions for reducing inflammation in familial Mediterranean fever.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for acute gout.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Guideline
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Interventions for reducing inflammation in familial Mediterranean fever.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  10. Guideline
  11. Interleukin-1 inhibitors for acute gout.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014
    Pooled it
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Comparison of Prednisolone, Etoricoxib, and Indomethacin in Treatment of Acute Gouty Arthritis: An Open-Label, Randomized, Controlled Trial.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2016
    Trial
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Robert A Terkeltaub
H Ralph Schumacher
John D Carter
Herbert S B Baraf
Robert R Evans
Jian Wang
Shirletta King-Davis
Steven P Weinstein
Regeneron (United States) · USCenter for Rheumatology · USPhiladelphia VA Medical Center · USUniversity of South Florida · USVA San Diego Healthcare System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn phase-3 clinical trials, the interleukin (IL-1) blocker, rilonacept (IL-1 Trap), demonstrated efficacy for gout flare prevention during initiation of urate-lowering therapy. This trial evaluated rilonacept added to a standard-of-care, indomethacin, for treatment of acute gout flares.

methodsAdults, aged 18-70 years, with gout presenting within 48 hours of flare onset and having at least moderate pain as well as swelling and tenderness in the index joint were randomized to subcutaneous (SC) rilonacept 320 mg at baseline plus oral indomethacin 50 mg TID for 3 days followed by 25 mg TID for up to 9 days (n = 74); SC placebo at baseline plus oral indomethacin as above (n=76); or SC rilonacept 320 mg at baseline plus oral placebo (n=75). The primary efficacy endpoint was change in pain in the index joint (patient-reported using a Likert scale (0=none; 4=extreme)) from baseline to the average of values at 24, 48 and 72 hours (composite time point) for rilonacept plus indomethacin versus indomethacin alone. Comparison of rilonacept monotherapy with indomethacin monotherapy was dependent on demonstration of significance for the primary endpoint. Safety evaluation included clinical laboratory and adverse event (AE) assessments.

resultsPatient characteristics were comparable among the groups; the population was predominantly male (94.1%), white (75.7%), with mean±SD age of 50.3±10.6 years. All treatment groups reported within-group pain reductions from baseline (P<0.0001). Although primary endpoint pain reduction was greater with rilonacept plus indomethacin (-1.55±0.92) relative to indomethacin alone (-1.40±0.96), the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.33), so formal comparison between monotherapy groups was not performed. Pain reduction over the 72-hour period with rilonacept alone (-0.69±0.97) was less than that in the other groups, but pain reduction was similar among groups at 72 hours. Treatment with rilonacept was well-tolerated with no reported serious AEs related to rilonacept. Across all groups, the most frequent AEs were headache and dizziness.

conclusionsAlthough generally well-tolerated, rilonacept in combination with indomethacin and rilonacept alone did not provide additional pain relief over 72 hours relative to indomethacin alone in patients with acute gout flare.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov registration number NCT00855920.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedArthritis, GoutyDouble-Blind MethodFemaleGout SuppressantsHumansIndomethacinMaleMiddle AgedRecombinant Fusion ProteinsTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultGout SuppressantsIndomethacinRecombinant Fusion Proteinsrilonacept

Identifiers

PMID23375025
PMCPMC3672764
OpenAlexW2129054895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.