Trial reportTrials2013
Use of the PiCCO system in critically ill patients with septic shock and acute respiratory distress syndrome: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Trials, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01526382 (Use of PiCCO System in Critically Ill Patients With Septic Shock and Acute Respiratory), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Use of PiCCO System in Critically Ill Patients With Septic Shock and Acute Respiratory
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of Pulse Indicator Continuous Cardiac Output Monitoring on Septic Shock Patients: A Meta-Analysis.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Automated monitoring compared to standard care for the early detection of sepsis in critically ill patients.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Effectiveness of treatment based on PiCCO parameters in critically ill patients with septic shock and/or acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial.Intensive care medicine · 2015Trial
- PiCCO or Cardiac Ultrasound? Which Is Better for Hemodynamic Monitoring in ICU?Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
- Incidence of Acute Pulmonary Edema Before and After the Systematic Use of Ultrasound B-Lines.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
- Pulmonary Embolism in Critically Ill Patients-Prevention, Diagnosis, and Management.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- The effects of hemodynamic monitoring using the PiCCO system on critically ill patients.American journal of translational research · 2021Article
- Accuracy of non-invasive and minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring: where do we stand?Annals of translational medicine · 2019Review
- Application of pulse index continuous cardiac output system in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: A prospective randomized study.World journal of clinical cases · 2019Article
- Observational
- ICU management based on PiCCO parameters reduces duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU length of stay in patients with severe thoracic trauma and acute respiratory distress syndrome.Annals of intensive care · 2016Article
- Cell-free DNA increase over first 48 hours in emergency intensive care unit predicts fatal outcome in patients with shock.The Journal of international medical research · 2016Observational
- The Diagnosis and Hemodynamic Monitoring of Circulatory Shock: Current and Future Trends.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2016Article
- Comments on Zhang et al.: Effectiveness of treatment based on PiCCO parameters in critically ill patients with septic shock and/or acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial.Intensive care medicine · 2015Article
- Effectiveness of treatment based on transpulmonary thermodilution in critically ill patients.Intensive care medicine · 2015Article
- Current concept of abdominal sepsis: WSES position paper.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHemodynamic monitoring is very important in critically ill patients with shock or acute respiratory distress syndrome(ARDS). The PiCCO (Pulse index Contour Continuous Cardiac Output, Pulsion Medical Systems, Germany) system has been developed and used in critical care settings for several years. However, its impact on clinical outcomes remains unknown. METHODS/
designThe study is a randomized controlled multi-center trial. A total of 708 patients with ARDS, septic shock or both will be included from January 2012 to January 2014. Subjects will be randomized to receive PiCCO monitoring or not. Our primary end point is 30-day mortality, and secondary outcome measures include ICU length of stay, days on mechanical ventilation, days of vasoactive agent support, ICU-free survival days during a 30-day period, mechanical-ventilation-free survival days during a 30-day period, and maximum SOFA score during the first 7 days. DISCUSSION: We investigate whether the use of PiCCO monitoring will improve patient outcomes in critically ill patients with ARDS or septic shock. This will provide additional data on hemodynamic monitoring and help clinicians to make decisions on the use of PiCCO.
trial registrationhttp://www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT01526382.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.