Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23374279›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2013

In vivo activity of nisin A and nisin V against Listeria monocytogenes in mice.

Alicia Campion, Pat G Casey, Des Field, Paul D Cotter, Colin Hill, R Paul Ross

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Are Antimicrobial Peptides a 21st-Century Solution for Atopic Dermatitis?International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Antimicrobial Compounds from Microorganisms.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Frontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alicia CampionDepartment of Microbiology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Pat G Casey
Des Field
Paul D Cotter
Colin Hill
R Paul Ross
University College Cork · IETeagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLantibiotics are post-translationally modified antimicrobial peptides, of which nisin A is the most extensively studied example. Bioengineering of nisin A has resulted in the generation of derivatives with increased in vitro potency against Gram-positive bacteria. Of these, nisin V (containing a Met21Val change) is noteworthy by virtue of exhibiting enhanced antimicrobial efficacy against a wide range of clinical and food-borne pathogens, including Listeria monocytogenes. However, this increased potency has not been tested in vivo.

resultsHere we address this issue by assessing the ability of nisin A and nisin V to control a bioluminescent strain of Listeria monocytogenes EGDe in a murine infection model.More specifically, Balb/c mice were infected via the intraperitoneal route at a dose of 1 × 10(5) cfu/animal and subsequently treated intraperitoneally with either nisin V, nisin A or a PBS control. Bioimaging of the mice was carried out on day 3 of the trial. Animals were then sacrificed and levels of infection were quantified in the liver and spleen.

conclusionThis analysis revealed that nisin V was more effective than Nisin A with respect to controlling infection and therefore merits further investigation with a view to potential chemotherapeutic applications.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsFemaleListeria monocytogenesListeriosisMiceMice, Inbred BALB CNisinTreatment OutcomeWhole Body ImagingAnti-Bacterial AgentsNisin

Identifiers

PMID23374279
PMCPMC3616995
OpenAlexW2146367987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.