SynthesisThe British journal of dermatology2013
U.K. standards of care for occupational contact dermatitis and occupational contact urticaria.
Synthesis in The British journal of dermatology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.
- European Society of Contact Dermatitis Guideline for Diagnostic Patch Testing-Recommendations on Best Practice (Update 2026).Contact dermatitis · 2026Guideline
- Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice Towards Urticaria in an Online Sample of the Chinese General Population.Acta dermato-venereologica · 2025Article
- New Insights Concerning Phytophotodermatitis Induced by Phototoxic Plants.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Allergic Contact Dermatitis in Pediatric Practice.Current pediatric reviews · 2024Review
- Article
- Occupational Skin Diseases among Building Construction Workers in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.Annals of global health · 2021Article
- Update of the S2k guideline on the management of IgE-mediated food allergies.Allergologie select · 2021Article
- Evaluation of skin problems and dermatology life quality index in health care workers who use personal protection measures during COVID-19 pandemic.Dermatologic therapy · 2020Article
- Occupational Dermatosis.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2019Review
- Asteraceae species as potential environmental factors of allergy.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2019Review
- Self-report occupational-related contact dermatitis: prevalence and risk factors among healthcare workers in Gondar town, Northwest Ethiopia, 2018-a cross-sectional study.Environmental health and preventive medicine · 2019Article
- Occupational and Hand Dermatitis: a Practical Approach.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2019Review
- Recent Trends in Occupational Contact Dermatitis.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2015Review
- Occupational skin allergies: testing and treatment (the case of occupational allergic contact dermatitis).Current allergy and asthma reports · 2014Review
- Incorporation of a barrier protection cream in the management of chronic hand dermatitis: focus on data supporting an established hand protectant formulation and modifications designed to assist in barrier repair.The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology · 2014Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The diagnosis of occupational contact dermatitis (OCD) and occupational contact urticaria (OCU) is a process that involves fastidious clinical and occupational history taking, clinical examination, patch testing and skin-prick testing. A temporal relationship of work and/or the presence of a rash on the hands only raises suspicion of an occupational cause, and does not necessarily confirm an occupational causation. The identification of allergy by patch or prick tests is a major objective, as exclusion of an offending allergen from the environment can contribute to clinical recovery in the individual worker and avoidance of new cases of disease. This can be a complex process where allergens and irritants, and therefore allergic and irritant contact dermatitis, may coexist. This article provides guidance to healthcare professionals dealing with workers exposed to agents that potentially cause OCD and OCU. Specifically it aims to summarize the 2010 British Occupational Health Research Foundation (BOHRF) systematic review, and also to help practitioners translate the BOHRF guideline into clinical practice. As such, it aims to be of value to physicians and nurses based in primary and secondary care, as well as occupational health and public health clinicians. It is hoped that it will also be of value to employers, interested workers and those with responsibility for workplace standards, such as health and safety representatives. Note that it is not intended, nor should it be taken to imply, that these standards of care override existing statutory and legal obligations. Duties under the U.K. Health and Safety at Work Act 1974, the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999, the Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations 2002, the Equality Act 2010 and other relevant legislation and guidance must be given due consideration, as should laws relevant to other countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.