ArticleBJU international2013
Male circumcision decreases penile sensitivity as measured in a large cohort.
Article in BJU international, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.
- Critical evaluation of contrasting evidence on whether male circumcision has adverse psychological effects: A systematic review.Journal of evidence-based medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Critical evaluation of arguments opposing male circumcision: A systematic review.Journal of evidence-based medicine · 2019Pooled it
- Use of a disposable circumcision suture device versus conventional circumcision: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Asian journal of andrologyPooled it
- The sensory penis: A comprehensive immunohistological and ontogenetic exploration of human penile innervation.Andrology · 2026Article
- Management of topical steroid therapy in male patients with lichen sclerosus after circumcision.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Sexual Mechanosensitivity: Age-Related Changes in the Innervation of the Human Prepuce.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- [Pediatric urology-common issues of the external genitalia in boys].Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Assessing the genetic relationship between phimosis and 26 urogenital diseases: a Mendelian randomization study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Article
- Immunohistological study of the density and distribution of human penile neural tissue: gradient hypothesis.International journal of impotence research · 2023Article
- What is the medical evidence on non-therapeutic child circumcision?International journal of impotence research · 2023Review
- Factors influencing satisfaction with male circumcision in Taiwan.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Masculinizing surgery in disorders/differences of sex development: clinician- and participant-evaluated appearance and function.BJU international · 2022Article
- Sensory innervation of the human male prepuce: Meissner's corpuscles predominate.Journal of anatomy · 2021Article
- Male Circumcision Due to Phimosis as the Procedure That Is Not Only Relieving Clinical Symptoms of Phimosis But Also Improves the Quality of Sexual Life.Sexual medicine · 2021Article
- The Contrasting Evidence Concerning the Effect of Male Circumcision on Sexual Function, Sensation, and Pleasure: A Systematic Review.Sexual medicine · 2020Review
- Relationship between each IPSS item score and erectile dysfunction in the Korean Internet Sexuality Survey (KISS): do men with weak streams have low sexual function?World journal of urology · 2020Article
- Male genital sensation after spinal cord injury: a review.Translational andrology and urology · 2020Review
- Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among Filipino boys subjected to non-therapeutic ritual or medical surgical procedures: A retrospective cohort study.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2019Article
- [Clinical effectiveness of disposable circumcision suture in children: a prospective randomized controlled trial].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2018Article
- Canadian Urological Association guideline on the care of the normal foreskin and neonatal circumcision in Canadian infants (full version).Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
unlabelledWHAT'S KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT? AND WHAT DOES THE STUDY ADD?: The sensitivity of the foreskin and its importance in erogenous sensitivity is widely debated and controversial. This is part of the actual public debate on circumcision for non-medical reason. Today some studies on the effect of circumcision on sexual function are available. However they vary widely in outcome. The present study shows in a large cohort of men, based on self-assessment, that the foreskin has erogenous sensitivity. It is shown that the foreskin is more sensitive than the uncircumcised glans mucosa, which means that after circumcision genital sensitivity is lost. In the debate on clitoral surgery the proven loss of sensitivity has been the strongest argument to change medical practice. In the present study there is strong evidence on the erogenous sensitivity of the foreskin. This knowledge hopefully can help doctors and patients in their decision on circumcision for non-medical reason.
objectivesTo test the hypothesis that sensitivity of the foreskin is a substantial part of male penile sensitivity. To determine the effects of male circumcision on penile sensitivity in a large sample. SUBJECTS AND
methodsThe study aimed at a sample size of ≈1000 men. Given the intimate nature of the questions and the intended large sample size, the authors decided to create an online survey. Respondents were recruited by means of leaflets and advertising.
resultsThe analysis sample consisted of 1059 uncircumcised and 310 circumcised men. For the glans penis, circumcised men reported decreased sexual pleasure and lower orgasm intensity. They also stated more effort was required to achieve orgasm, and a higher percentage of them experienced unusual sensations (burning, prickling, itching, or tingling and numbness of the glans penis). For the penile shaft a higher percentage of circumcised men described discomfort and pain, numbness and unusual sensations. In comparison to men circumcised before puberty, men circumcised during adolescence or later indicated less sexual pleasure at the glans penis, and a higher percentage of them reported discomfort or pain and unusual sensations at the penile shaft.
conclusionsThis study confirms the importance of the foreskin for penile sensitivity, overall sexual satisfaction, and penile functioning. Furthermore, this study shows that a higher percentage of circumcised men experience discomfort or pain and unusual sensations as compared with the uncircumcised population. Before circumcision without medical indication, adult men, and parents considering circumcision of their sons, should be informed of the importance of the foreskin in male sexuality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.