Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23373740›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of audiology2013

Impact of daily noise exposure monitoring on occupational noise exposures in manufacturing workers.

Michael F McTague, Deron Galusha, Christine Dixon-Ernst, Sharon R Kirsche, Martin D Slade, Mark R Cullen, Peter M Rabinowitz

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of audiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06729632 (Non-Invasive System to Deliver Therapeutic Hypothermia for Protection Against Noise-Induced Hearing Loss), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06729632 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Non-Invasive System to Deliver Therapeutic Hypothermia for Protection Against Noise-Induced Hearing Loss

TypeinterventionalSponsorRestorear Devices LLCRan2024 to 2027Enrolled116ConditionsNoise Exposure, Noise-induced Hearing Loss, Noise, Adverse EffectArmsCold pack-delivered mild therapeutic hypothermia
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Recent advances in hearing conservation programmes: A systematic review.The South African journal of communication disorders = Die Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir Kommunikasieafwykings · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Design and testing of a personalized noise monitoring system.Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene · 2023
    Article
  5. Does occupational noise matter amongst manufacturing (small and medium enterprises) workers? Empirical evidence from Magaba, Mbare, Zimbabwe.The South African journal of communication disorders = Die Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir Kommunikasieafwykings · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Methods for evaluating temporal trends in noise exposure.International journal of audiology · 2014
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Michael F McTagueYale Occupational and Environmental Medicine Program, New Haven, Connecticut, USA. michael.mctague@yale.edu
Deron Galusha
Christine Dixon-Ernst
Sharon R Kirsche
Martin D Slade
Mark R Cullen
Peter M Rabinowitz

Funding

Risk factors for Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementia: Evidence from a Large Occupational CohortR01AG026291 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CANTLEY, LINDA, EISEN, ELLEN AURA · 2006 to 2021
$12.9M
Daily Exposure Monitoring Intervention to Prevent Hearing LossR01OH008641 · OH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI NEITZEL, RICHARD L, RABINOWITZ, PETER MACGARR · 2007 to 2015
$4.3M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG026291NIOSH CDC HHS 1 R01 OH008641-01A2NIOSH CDC HHS R01 OH008641
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDespite the use of hearing protection devices (HPDs), noise induced hearing loss (NIHL) remains one of the most prevalent occupational conditions. A new technology allows for daily monitoring of noise exposures under HPDs. We report on an intervention employing the voluntary use of this technology in a worksite setting.

designVolunteers were fitted with a device allowing them to monitor noise exposure under their hearing protection on a daily basis. The trends in noise exposures for individuals who completed at least six months of the intervention were analysed. STUDY SAMPLE: Recruitment occurred at three manufacturing facilities, with 127 workers enrolling and 66 workers actively using the device during their work shifts.

resultsAmong volunteers downloading regularly, the percentage of daily exposures in excess of the OSHA action level (85 dBA) decreased from 14% to 8%, while the percentage of daily exposures in excess of 90 dBA decreased from 4% to less than 2%.

conclusionInitial results from this longitudinal study indicate that volunteers find daily noise exposure monitoring to be feasible, and that workers who monitor daily are able to reduce exposures. The results of subject adherence shed light on the challenges and possibilities of worksite interventions for health and safety.

Indexed as

AdultEar Protective DevicesEnvironmental MonitoringFemaleHearing Loss, Noise-InducedHumansIndustryLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedNoise, OccupationalOccupational DiseasesOccupational ExposureSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesUnited States Occupational Safety and Health Administration

Identifiers

PMID23373740
PMCPMC3709598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.