Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23373664›Full record

Trial reportAIDS patient care and STDs2013

Patient-nominated, community-based HIV treatment supporters: patient perspectives, feasibility, challenges, and factors for success in HIV-infected South African adults.

Monique M Duwell, Amy R Knowlton, Jean B Nachega, Anne Efron, Rene Goliath, Chelsea Morroni, Gary Maartens, Richard E Chaisson

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in AIDS patient care and STDs, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Dynamics of Treatment Supporters and Patients Starting HIV Therapy in Lima, Peru.Journal of the International Association of Providers of AIDS Care
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Monique M DuwellDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Amy R Knowlton
Jean B Nachega
Anne Efron
Rene Goliath
Chelsea Morroni
Gary Maartens
Richard E Chaisson

Funding

Vaccine Response and Immunotherapeutics SWGP30AI094189 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Richard E. Chaisson · 2012 to 2026
$67.0M
UNDERLYING MECHANISMS OF SCHISTOSOME/SNAIL COMPATIBILITYR01AI016137 · NIAID · OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BAYNE, CHRISTOPHER JEFFREY · 1989 to 2012
$3.1M
DOT-HAART for HIV-Infected South African AdultsR01AI055359 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CHAISSON, RICHARD E. · 2003 to 2008
$2.6M
DOT-HARRT for HIV-Infected South African AdultsK23AI068582 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI NACHEGA, JEAN BISIMWA · 2006 to 2010
$652k
Underlying mechanisms of schistosome/snail compatibilityR21AI016137 · NIAID · OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BAYNE, CHRISTOPHER JEFFREY · 2001 to 2001
$273k
SCHISTOSOME-SNAIL COMPATIBILITY: UNDERLYING MECHANISMSR22AI016137 · NIAID · OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BAYNE, CHRISTOPHER JEFFREY · 1985 to 1991
–
NIAID NIH HHS AI 016137NIAID NIH HHS AI 068582-01NIAID NIH HHS AI 5535901NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI094189
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to characterize the experience of having a treatment supporter among HIV-infected South African patients enrolled in a randomized controlled trial that compared the efficacy of patient-nominated treatment supporters administering partial directly observed antiretroviral therapy (DOT-ART) versus self-administered ART (Self-ART). Results of the parent study showed no virologic or sustained immunologic differences between groups, but revealed a significant survival benefit among the DOT-ART group. One hypothesis is that this survival benefit may be explained by differences in the training and involvement of the treatment supporters between groups. In the current study, results from a semi-structured exit interview of 172 participants indicate that most participants in both arms maintained a positive, satisfying relationship with a single supporter, typically family member or friend. Most patients (82.6%) perceived supporters as helpful with medication adherence, with no significant difference between groups (p=0.752). Additionally, supporters provided emotional, instrumental, and material support. DOT-ART patients were more likely than Self-ART patients to report that their supporter helped to decrease drug or alcohol use (p=0.03). Patients identified supporter trustworthiness, availability, good communication and reciprocity of support as factors beneficial to a successful relationship. These results suggest: (1) Patient-nominated peers are feasible candidates for ART supporters in this resource-constrained setting; (2) In addition to assistance with medications, treatment supporters have the capacity to promote healthy behaviors and provide other types of support, which may contribute to improved outcomes, particularly with enhanced training; (3) Trustworthiness, availability, good communication, and reciprocity are key factors in a successful patient-supporter relationship.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringAdultAnti-HIV AgentsCD4 Lymphocyte CountCommunity Health ServicesDirectly Observed TherapyFeasibility StudiesFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleSelf CareSocial SupportSouth AfricaSurvival AnalysisViral LoadAnti-HIV Agents

Identifiers

PMID23373664
PMCPMC3565551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.