Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23372829›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Multiple breast cancer cell-lines derived from a single tumor differ in their molecular characteristics and tumorigenic potential.

Goar Mosoyan, Chandandeep Nagi, Svetlana Marukian, Avelino Teixeira, Anait Simonian, Lois Resnick-Silverman, Analisa DiFeo, Dean Johnston, Sandra R Reynolds, Daniel F Roses and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Identification ofCell journal · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Endometrial cancer and its cell lines.Molecular biology reports · 2020
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Goar MosoyanDepartment of Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York, United States of America.
Chandandeep Nagi
Svetlana Marukian
Avelino Teixeira
Anait Simonian
Lois Resnick-Silverman
Analisa DiFeo
Dean Johnston
Sandra R Reynolds
Daniel F Roses
Arevik Mosoian
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USNew York University · USCase Comprehensive Cancer CenterHemoShear (United States) · USHunter College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast cancer cell lines are widely used tools to investigate breast cancer biology and to develop new therapies. Breast cancer tissue contains molecularly heterogeneous cell populations. Thus, it is important to understand which cell lines best represent the primary tumor and have similarly diverse phenotype. Here, we describe the development of five breast cancer cell lines from a single patient's breast cancer tissue. We characterize the molecular profiles, tumorigenicity and metastatic ability in vivo of all five cell lines and compare their responsiveness to 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT) treatment.

methodsFive breast cancer cell lines were derived from a single patient's primary breast cancer tissue. Expression of different antigens including HER2, estrogen receptor (ER), CK8/18, CD44 and CD24 was determined by flow cytometry, western blotting and immunohistochemistry (IHC). In addition, a Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization (FISH) assay for HER2 gene amplification and p53 genotyping was performed on all cell lines. A xenograft model in nude mice was utilized to assess the tumorigenic and metastatic abilities of the breast cancer cells.

resultsWe have isolated, cloned and established five new breast cancer cell lines with different tumorigenicity and metastatic abilities from a single primary breast cancer. Although all the cell lines expressed low levels of ER, their growth was estrogen-independent and all had high-levels of expression of mutated non-functional p53. The HER2 gene was rearranged in all cell lines. Low doses of 4-OHT induced proliferation of these breast cancer cell lines.

conclusionsAll five breast cancer cell lines have different antigenic expression profiles, tumorigenicity and organ specific metastatic abilities although they derive from a single tumor. None of the studied markers correlated with tumorigenic potential. These new cell lines could serve as a model for detailed genomic and proteomic analyses to identify mechanisms of organ-specific metastasis of breast cancer.

Indexed as

Cell Line, TumorCell Transformation, NeoplasticAnimalsAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalBreast NeoplasmsCD24 AntigenCell ProliferationErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesEstrogen Receptor alphaFemaleGene AmplificationGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansHyaluronan ReceptorsMiceNeoplasm MetastasisAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalCD24 AntigenErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesEstrogen Receptor alphaHyaluronan ReceptorsTamoxifenTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID23372829
PMCPMC3555897
OpenAlexW2038179210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.