SynthesisPloS one2013
Effect of parenteral selenium supplementation in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The effect of selenium therapy in critically ill patients: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.European journal of medical research · 2023Pooled it
- The Role of Nutrition in COVID-19 Susceptibility and Severity of Disease: A Systematic Review.The Journal of nutrition · 2021Pooled it
- A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials: Efficacy of selenium treatment for sepsis.Medicine · 2019Pooled it
- High-dose intravenous selenium does not improve clinical outcomes in the critically ill: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Critical care (London, England) · 2016Pooled it
- Parenteral trace element provision: recent clinical research and practical conclusions.European journal of clinical nutrition · 2016Pooled it
- Selenium supplementation for critically ill adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Effect of parenteral selenium supplementation in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2013Pooled it
- Efficacy of Acetylcysteine and Selenium in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Patients: A Prospective, Multicenter, Single Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of Korean medical science · 2023Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Can selenium-enriched spirulina supplementation ameliorate sepsis outcomes in selenium-deficient animals?Physiological reports · 2021Article
- Clinical Significance of Micronutrient Supplementation in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients with Severe ARDS.Nutrients · 2021Article
- Polymer Nanocomposites of Selenium Biofabricated Using Fungi.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Determination of Selenium in Common and Selenium-Rich Rice from Different Areas in China and Assessment of Their Dietary Intake.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Nutrition in alcohol-related liver disease: Physiopathology and management.World journal of gastroenterology · 2020Review
- Nutrition in Sepsis: A Bench-to-Bedside Review.Nutrients · 2020Review
- Dietary antioxidant seleno-L-methionine protects macrophages infected with Burkholderia thailandensis.PloS one · 2020Article
- Serum Concentrations of Trace Elements Zinc, Copper, Selenium, and Manganese in Critically Ill Patients.Biological trace element research · 2019Observational
- The Effect of High-dose Parenteral Sodium Selenite in Critically Ill Patients following Sepsis: A Clinical and Mechanistic Study.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIt is currently unclear whether parenteral selenium supplementation should be recommended in the management of critically ill patients. Here we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of parenteral selenium supplementation on clinical outcomes. METHODS/PRINCIPAL
findingsRandomized trials investigating parenteral selenium supplementation administered in addition to standard of care to critically ill patients were included. CENTRAL, Medline, EMBASE, the Science Citation Index, and CINAHL were searched with complementary manual searches. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Trials published in any language were included. Two authors independently extracted data and assessed trial quality. A third author was consulted to resolve disagreements and for quality assurance. Twelve trials were included and meta-analysis was performed on nine trials that recruited critically ill septic patients. These comprised 965 participants in total. Of these, 148 patients (30.7%) in the treatment groups, and 180 patients (37.3%) in control groups died. Parenteral selenium treatment significantly reduced all-cause mortality in critically ill patients with sepsis (relative risk [RR] 0.83, 95% CI 0.70-0.99, p = 0.04, I(2) = 0%). Subgroup analyses demonstrated that the administration schedule employing longer duration (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.63-0.94, p = 0.01, I(2) = 0%), loading boluses (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.58-0.94, p = 0.01, I(2) = 0%) or high-dose selenium treatment (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.61-0.99, p = 0.04, I(2) = 0%) might be associated with a lower mortality risk. There was no evidence of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Parenteral selenium supplementation reduces risk of mortality among critically ill patients with sepsis. Owing to the varied methodological quality of the studies, future high-quality randomized trials that directly focus on the effect of adequate-duration of parenteral selenium supplementation for severe septic patients are needed to confirm our results. Clinicians should consider these findings when treating this high-risk population. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO 2011; CRD42011001768.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.