Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23372672›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Does wheat genetically modified for disease resistance affect root-colonizing pseudomonads and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi?

Joana Beatrice Meyer, Yi Song-Wilson, Andrea Foetzki, Carolin Luginbühl, Michael Winzeler, Yvan Kneubühler, Caterina Matasci, Fabio Mascher-Frutschi, Olena Kalinina, Thomas Boller and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Plant-microbiome interactions for sustainable agriculture: a review.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2021
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The plant microbiome.Genome biology · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Joana Beatrice MeyerPlant Pathology, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich, Switzerland.
Yi Song-Wilson
Andrea Foetzki
Carolin Luginbühl
Michael Winzeler
Yvan Kneubühler
Caterina Matasci
Fabio Mascher-Frutschi
Olena Kalinina
Thomas Boller
Christoph Keel
Monika Maurhofer
Agroscope · CHUniversity of Basel · CHETH Zurich · CHUniversity of Lausanne · CHUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of genetically modified (GM) wheat with introduced pm3b mildew resistance transgene, on two types of root-colonizing microorganisms, namely pseudomonads and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF). Our investigations were carried out in field trials over three field seasons and at two locations. Serial dilution in selective King's B medium and microscopy were used to assess the abundance of cultivable pseudomonads and AMF, respectively. We developed a denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) method to characterize the diversity of the pqqC gene, which is involved in Pseudomonas phosphate solubilization. A major result was that in the first field season Pseudomonas abundances and diversity on roots of GM pm3b lines, but also on non-GM sister lines were different from those of the parental lines and conventional wheat cultivars. This indicates a strong effect of the procedures by which these plants were created, as GM and sister lines were generated via tissue cultures and propagated in the greenhouse. Moreover, Pseudomonas population sizes and DGGE profiles varied considerably between individual GM lines with different genomic locations of the pm3b transgene. At individual time points, differences in Pseudomonas and AMF accumulation between GM and control lines were detected, but they were not consistent and much less pronounced than differences detected between young and old plants, different conventional wheat cultivars or at different locations and field seasons. Thus, we conclude that impacts of GM wheat on plant-beneficial root-colonizing microorganisms are minor and not of ecological importance. The cultivation-independent pqqC-DGGE approach proved to be a useful tool for monitoring the dynamics of Pseudomonas populations in a wheat field and even sensitive enough for detecting population responses to altered plant physiology.

Indexed as

Plants, Genetically ModifiedBacterial ProteinsColony Count, MicrobialDenaturing Gradient Gel ElectrophoresisGene ExpressionMycorrhizaePlant ImmunityPlant ProteinsPseudomonasSeasonsTransgenesTriticumBacterial ProteinsPlant ProteinsPm3b protein, Triticum aestivumPqqC protein, Bacteria

Identifiers

PMID23372672
PMCPMC3553117
OpenAlexW2005684550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.